Motorola Moto G 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 212 g 213 g
Height 166.1 mm 162 mm
Width 76.1 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 88 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Adreno 619 Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto G 5G and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm162 × 77.3 × 8 mmS24 FE is shorter and thinner, potentially more pocketable; Moto G is taller and thicker. Moto G is bulkier overall.
Weight212g213gVirtually the same weight; both feel similar in hand.

Display

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.7"Both have same screen size, similar viewing experience in terms of screen real estate.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Very similar sharpness, both are sharp for typical use.
PPI393385Virtually identical pixel density, display sharpness is practically the same.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDS24 FE offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better viewing angles; better for watching movies, HDR content and outdoor visibility.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzS24 FE provides smoother scrolling, animations, and gaming; noticeably better user experience. Moto G screen may feel less fluid.
Brightness0 nits1900 nitsS24 FE is significantly brighter, much easier to see outdoors in bright sunlight. Moto G brightness data is missing and would likely be significantly lower.

Performance

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Exynos 2400e (4 nm)S24 FE's 4nm chip is far more powerful and energy-efficient; significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score390,0001,600,000S24 FE is drastically faster; provides a noticeably superior overall performance, and will remain usable for much longer.
GPUAdreno 619Xclipse 940S24 FE offers significantly better graphics performance; better for gaming, graphic intensive apps, video editing and VR.

Camera

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.7, 0.80µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.57" sensor, 1.00µm pixelsS24 FE has slightly higher resolution and larger pixels, likely offering better image quality, especially in low light, due to a more sensitive sensor; Moto G has slightly wider aperture that helps with low light.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.2, 1.00µm pixels10.8MP, f/2.4, 1/2.65" sensor, 1.22µm pixelsMoto G has a higher resolution front camera, while the S24 FE has larger pixels, potentially offering better low-light performance.
Telephoto LensNone8MP, f/2.4, 1/4.4" sensor, 1.00µm pixelsS24 FE has a dedicated telephoto lens, allowing for optical zoom, resulting in better image quality when zooming in compared to digital zoom offered on the Moto G.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixels13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1" sensor, 1.12µm pixelsS24 FE offers a higher resolution wide angle lens, capturing more detail in group shots and landscapes; both have same aperture value and pixel size.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm pixelsNoneMoto G has dedicated Macro lens, for taking close-up images with additional detail; S24 FE cannot take macro pictures.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps, EISUp to 8K@30fps, OIS, 4K@120fpsS24 FE has superior video recording capabilities, offering higher resolutions, higher frame rate, better image quality, and smoother video due to optical stabilization.
DxOMarkNot Tested133 (Mobile)S24 FE has a good camera overall, but Moto G camera performance remains unknown.

Battery

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh4700mAhMoto G has slightly larger battery, potentially providing a longer battery life.
Charging20W fast charging25W fast chargingS24 FE charges faster, reducing charging time; combined with lower consumption chipset means both should have similar battery life.
FeaturesNon-removableBypass Charging, Reverse charging, Non-removable, 15W wireless chargingS24 FE offers added convenience with wireless charging and the ability to charge other devices using reverse charging, and keeps the phone cool while gaming or charging using Bypass charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery might offer slightly longer battery life than the S24 FE in some use cases, though real-world performance will vary.
  • Macro Lens: Includes a dedicated macro lens, allowing close-up shots with good detail.
  • Lower Price Point: Often the Moto G series of phones are positioned in a lower price point category than the S series of Samsung phones.

Practical Implications: The Moto G 5G is suitable for users who prioritize battery life and have a budget in mind. The macro lens is a unique feature, useful for those who enjoy close-up photography. However it's not a replacement for other types of camera lenses.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with 120Hz refresh rate and high brightness provides a much better visual experience, especially in bright conditions.
  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Exynos 2400e chipset offers a huge performance jump, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming, better future proofing.
  • Better Camera System: Features a telephoto lens for optical zoom, higher resolution wide-angle camera, and superior video recording capabilities, significantly better photos and video capture for casual and semi-professional use cases.
  • Modern Features: Offers advanced battery features such as Wireless Charging, Reverse Charging and Bypass Charging.
  • Modern Connectivity: Offers superior WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity for future-proofing and reliable connections.
  • Better Build Quality: Offers more durable build quality with superior Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ screen protection and additional environmental sensors.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 vs Android 10 which means modern features and a phone that is updated for longer.

Practical Implications: The S24 FE is geared towards users who want a premium experience, encompassing a top-notch display, high performance, and a versatile camera system. The advanced features like wireless charging, reverse charging, better connectivity, and superior build quality offer a significantly more modern experience. The S24 FE will be a phone that is usable for a long time.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Moto G 5G trades significantly lower performance, a standard LCD screen, and a less advanced camera system for a slightly larger battery and lower price point.
  • The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a smaller battery, and is more expensive, but it compensates by higher performance and a premium experience across the board.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G - Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users
  • Users who want a basic smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, messaging, social media
  • Users who prioritize a slightly larger battery
  • Users who occasionally take close-up macro photos

Use Cases:

  • Basic everyday communication
  • Casual social media browsing
  • Occasional mobile gaming
  • Macro photography enthusiasts

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Ideal User:

  • Users who want a high-performance smartphone
  • Users who value an excellent display for media consumption and gaming
  • Users who desire a versatile camera system with good video recording features
  • Users who want additional features like wireless charging, reverse charging, better connectivity, higher performance and build quality.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile gaming
  • Video streaming and content consumption
  • Photography and videography
  • Multitasking and productivity
  • Users who desire a reliable and high performance phone for years to come.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola Moto G 5G provides basic functionality at a low price point, it is a budget friendly option.
  • The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE justifies its higher price tag with premium features, modern performance and overall better user experience making it the better value in the long run.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? (Moto G 5G is much more budget friendly)
  2. How important is performance for gaming and multitasking? (S24 FE is dramatically better)
  3. How important is a great display and a versatile camera? (S24 FE is significantly better)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Usage: If you have a very tight budget and only need a basic smartphone for calls, messages, and casual social media, the Motorola Moto G 5G is sufficient, but you will be sacrificing overall performance, camera quality and features.
  • Scenario 2: Balanced Budget, Good Experience: If you have some flexibility with your budget and want a much better overall experience with superior performance, a great display, a versatile camera and modern features, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Performance and Feature Focused: If performance, superior camera capabilities, a great display, additional features like wireless charging, reverse charging, better connectivity, build quality, and longevity are very important to you, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the clear winner.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.

Here's why:

While the Motorola Moto G 5G offers a slightly larger battery and macro lens, it falls significantly short in every other critical aspect. The S24 FE's AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate is a game-changer for everyday usage and media consumption. The substantial performance boost from the Exynos 2400e chipset ensures a smoother, faster, and more future-proof experience. The superior camera system with its telephoto lens and advanced video recording features is also a significant advantage.

Furthermore, the additional features like wireless charging, reverse charging, better connectivity, superior build quality, screen protection and newer software make the S24 FE a much more modern and compelling device. The S24 FE represents a better value for a long term experience, it provides a complete and enjoyable user experience, making it the clear winner for my needs and preferences. The price premium is justified by the superior features and performance, making the overall experience much better than the Moto G.

While the Moto G 5G is a budget friendly option, if possible, investing in the S24 FE would provide a far more satisfying and long-lasting experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.