Motorola Moto G 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 March 24, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 96.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 212 g 189 g
Height 166.1 mm 159.6 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 85.4 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 51.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy A53 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mmThe Moto G 5G is noticeably larger and thicker, making the A53 5G more pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight212g189gA53 5G is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and portability.
Display
Size6.7"6.5"Moto G 5G has a slightly larger screen, which might be preferable for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both phones have the same resolution, so similar sharpness will be noticeable.
PPI393405Both phones have very similar pixel density, rendering sharp images.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDThe A53 5G has superior display with deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, better contrast, and more power efficiency with dark modes.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe A53 5G offers significantly smoother animations and scrolling, resulting in a more fluid user experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phone's brightness is listed as 0, which is an issue with data and needs to be clarified.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 750G (8nm)Exynos 1280 (5nm)The A53 5G's chipset is more efficient and offers better overall performance due to its smaller manufacturing process and architecture.
AnTuTu Score390,000475,448The A53 5G performs better in benchmarks, indicating faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68Both phones have different GPU's, meaning slightly different gaming performance characteristics.
Camera
Standard Lens48MP, f/1.7, 0.8µm64MP, f/1.8The A53 5G has a higher resolution sensor which should capture more detail, while the Moto G 5G's wider aperture may perform slightly better in low-light.
Selfie Lens16MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm32MP, f/2.2The A53 5G has a higher resolution selfie camera, resulting in more detailed photos.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm12MP, f/2.2The A53 5G's wide-angle lens will capture higher resolution, wider shots.
Portrait Mode (depth)None5MP, f/2.4The A53 5G offers depth sensing, enabling better background blur in portrait photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm5MP, f/2.4The A53 5G offers higher resolution macro photos.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps, EISUp to 4K@30fps, EISBoth phones capture good quality video, however the A53 5G has better video stabilization.
DxOMarkNot testedMobile: 79 Photo: 98, Video: 45The A53 5G's camera has a verified camera performance, showcasing good photo quality but limited video performance. The Moto G 5G has no such tests available.
FeaturesTriple Camera, LAF, RAW, Night ModeQuad Camera, OISThe A53 5G offers more versatility with optical image stabilization (OIS), which improves video and low-light photo quality, while the Moto G has specific features like Night Mode.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones have similar battery capacity suggesting comparable battery life for daily use.
Charging20W25WThe A53 5G charges slightly faster, reducing downtime.
Charger includedYesNoThe A53 5G doesn't come with a charger which is an extra expense.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12The A53 5G has a newer OS, offering access to the latest features and security updates.
Max OS UpdateNot providedAndroid 16The A53 5G is promised with additional software updates. The Moto G 5G has no such information.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBThe A53 5G comes with more storage options (128GB or 256GB) for more apps, photos, and videos.
RAM4GB/6GB4GB/6GB/8GBThe A53 5G offers an 8GB RAM option, improving performance when multitasking or running demanding applications.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Slightly larger display: 6.7" screen may be preferred for media consumption.
  • Wider Aperture on main camera: f/1.7 may offer better low-light performance (although not guaranteed).
  • Included charger: No need to purchase an additional charger.
  • RAW image capture, Laser Autofocus, Night Mode: Useful features for specific photography styles.

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED panel offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and better power efficiency with dark mode.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate leads to a more fluid and responsive user experience.
  • Faster Performance: Exynos 1280 chipset provides better benchmark scores, meaning faster app loading and multitasking.
  • Better Cameras: Higher resolution sensors and OIS for better overall picture quality, especially video, and portrait photos.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging gets you back up and running quicker.
  • More Storage Options: Available with 256GB for storing more files.
  • More RAM Options: Available with 8GB of RAM for superior multitasking.
  • Newer Software: Ships with Android 12 and a promise of future updates.
  • Stereo speakers: Enhanced audio experience for media consumption and gaming.
  • Better screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 compared to the unknown protection of the Motorola.

Trade-offs:

  • The Moto G 5G is larger and heavier, and has an IPS LCD screen, a less performant chipset and less overall photo/video quality but it does include a charger, and has specific camera features like RAW support and Laser Autofocus.
  • The Samsung A53 5G has a better, smoother and more vibrant screen, more RAM and storage options, better performance, and better cameras. However, it is more expensive, doesn't come with a charger, and has an Exynos chipset instead of a Snapdragon which some users may dislike.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users: Seeking a large screen and 5G connectivity on a budget.
  • Users focused on specific camera features such as RAW support, Laser Autofocus, and Night Mode.
  • Users who prefer a larger device and don't mind the added weight.
  • Users who don't prioritize a premium display or the latest software.

Use Cases:

  • Casual browsing, social media, and video streaming.
  • Users who need a device that can last a full day on a single charge.
  • Basic photography and video recording needs
  • Users who appreciate a built-in charger.

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize display quality and smooth performance.
  • Users who value photography and videography.
  • Users who want a phone that will receive ongoing software support.
  • Users willing to pay more for premium features.

Use Cases:

  • Gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • High-quality photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions.
  • Users who want a phone with a premium feel and overall experience.
  • Users who prioritize an enhanced audio experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G 5G will likely be cheaper while the A53 5G offers more premium features at a higher price.
  2. How important is display quality and refresh rate to you? The A53 5G has a significantly superior AMOLED 120Hz screen.
  3. What are your camera priorities? The A53 5G offers better overall quality, and features like OIS while the Moto G has specific features like RAW capture, Laser Autofocus, and Night Mode.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is the top concern. The Motorola Moto G 5G is likely the better value option for those on a strict budget. However, you will have to make significant sacrifices in the screen quality and performance departments.
  • Scenario 2: Smooth performance and a vibrant display are important. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the obvious choice due to its 120Hz AMOLED screen, faster chipset and more RAM.
  • Scenario 3: Photography and videography are a priority. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better option due to the better camera sensors, OIS, and better video recording.

What I would Choose and Why

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would select the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. While it is likely more expensive, the advantages it offers are significant and impactful to daily use.

My rationale is as follows:

  • Superior Display: The 120Hz AMOLED screen is a game-changer for a smooth, enjoyable user experience. It is vastly better than an IPS LCD screen.
  • Performance: The Exynos 1280 offers better benchmark performance, which is a great advantage for everyday tasks, multitasking and for more intensive applications such as games.
  • Camera Quality: The A53 5G has significantly better cameras due to the higher resolution sensors and OIS. This ensures I capture higher quality photos and videos.
  • Software & Updates: The newer operating system, and the promise of future updates means it will be supported for longer and have access to the latest features.

While the Motorola Moto G 5G offers good value on a budget with a slightly larger display and a charger in the box, the A53 5G's display, performance, and camera are worth the additional cost for a better user experience. The lack of a charger in the box with the Samsung is unfortunate, but it is a one-time inconvenience compared to the daily user experience with the AMOLED display.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.