1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G 5G | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm | 164.2 × 76.1 × 9.1 mm | The Moto G 5G is slightly taller and thicker, making the A32 5G more pocketable and potentially comfortable for smaller hands. |
| Weight | 212g | 205g | The A32 5G is lighter, which might be noticeable during extended one-handed use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | Moto G 5G offers slightly more screen real estate for media consumption and browsing. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | Moto G 5G provides a noticeably sharper display, enhancing clarity for text, images, and videos. |
| PPI | 393 | 270 | The higher pixel density on the Moto G 5G results in a crisper, more detailed visual experience. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT LCD | The IPS LCD on the Moto G 5G typically offers better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to TFT LCD. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | Both have standard refresh rate; neither offers smoother scrolling or animations. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both seem to lack brightness data. This makes comparison impossible |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Snapdragon 750G is generally more powerful for gaming and demanding apps. The 7nm Mediatek chip is more efficient. |
| AnTuTu Score | 390,000 | 249,720 | The Moto G 5G is significantly faster in benchmarks, resulting in better performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC3 | The Adreno 619 GPU in the Moto G 5G is expected to handle graphics-intensive tasks and games more smoothly than the Mali-G57 in the A32 5G. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 48MP, f/1.7 | 48MP, f/1.8 | Moto G 5G's slightly wider aperture could result in better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.2 | 13MP, f/2.2 | Moto G 5G has a higher resolution selfie camera, potentially capturing more detailed self-portraits. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | Both cameras are identical, suggesting comparable wide-angle shots. |
| Portrait Mode (depth) | N/A | 2MP, f/2.4 | The A32 5G has an additional dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode photography. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | 5MP, f/2.4 | The A32 5G has a higher resolution macro lens, capturing more details in close-up shots. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps | Moto G 5G supports 1080p at 60fps while the A32 5G supports 1080p at 120fps which is good for slow-motion. Both have EIS. |
| Camera Features | PDAF, LAF, RAW, Night Mode | Ultra stable video | Moto G 5G offers more manual controls like RAW shooting and a dedicated night mode. The A32 5G has Ultra stable video. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones offer a similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life. |
| Charging | 20W fast charging | 15W fast charging | The Moto G 5G charges slightly faster, reducing downtime. |
| Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer | Both are non-removable batteries. Both battery types have minor advantages based on the design (shape, cost) |
| Other | |||
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (upgradeable to 13) | The A32 5G has a newer OS version and will likely receive future Android updates, ensuring more software support and features. |
| RAM | 4GB/6GB | 4GB/6GB/8GB | A32 5G offers the option of more RAM, improving multitasking and gaming capabilities |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | No expandable storage on either device. |
| Audio Features | 2 Microphones | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Samsung provides better spatial audio, better surround sound. Moto G 5G has 2 microphones for clear calls. |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Rear-mounted | Side-mounted | The side-mounted sensor is generally considered more convenient and responsive than a rear-mounted sensor. |
| Sensors | Compass, Gyroscope, Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Geomagnetic, Proximity | Motorola Moto G 5G provides better support for apps that require gyroscope for example, AR and VR apps. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution and pixel density (1080x2400, 393 ppi) resulting in a sharper, clearer visual experience with better viewing angles and more accurate color reproduction due to the IPS LCD screen compared to the TFT LCD in the A32 5G.
- Stronger Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset paired with the Adreno 619 GPU provides better overall performance, particularly in gaming and multitasking, indicated by a much higher AnTuTu benchmark score (390,000 vs 249,720).
- Faster Charging: 20W fast charging ensures quicker battery top-ups compared to the 15W charging on the A32 5G.
- Enhanced Camera Features: Includes PDAF, LAF, RAW and Night mode, providing more flexibility for photography.
- More Sensors: Has compass and gyroscope, which can be beneficial for some applications and gaming.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 11 (upgradeable to 13), offering more up-to-date features and longer software support compared to Android 10 on the Moto G 5G.
- More RAM options: Options for 8GB RAM, good for more demanding apps, better gaming and more seamless multitasking.
- Better Audio: Dolby Atmos and Digital Plus for an immersive audio experience, especially for media consumption.
- Dedicated Depth Sensor: Offers a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode capabilities.
- Higher Resolution Macro Camera: Better close-up photography with a 5MP macro lens compared to the 2MP on the Moto G 5G.
- More Convenient Fingerprint Sensor: Side-mounted sensor is considered more ergonomically friendly.
- Better Slow Motion Video: 1080p at 120fps will be beneficial for users who often use slow-motion video.
- Better Satellite Support: Better GPS accuracy due to Beidou satellite system support.
Significant Trade-offs:
- The Moto G 5G trades camera features and slightly better audio for significantly higher performance and a superior display.
- The Galaxy A32 5G sacrifices some performance for a newer OS and more specific camera features.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola Moto G 5G is ideal for:
- Gamers and Power Users: The more powerful Snapdragon 750G and Adreno 619 GPU make it well-suited for users who engage in demanding tasks like gaming and heavy multitasking.
- Media Consumers: The higher resolution and better display technology (IPS LCD) are perfect for users who watch videos and browse the web often.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Features such as RAW image capture, PDAF, LAF, and night mode will be appealing to those who want more control over their photos.
- Users Who Value Fast Charging: Benefit from quicker charging, reducing downtime
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is ideal for:
- General Users: The A32 5G provides a well-rounded experience for everyday use with a focus on multimedia and capturing memories.
- Casual Photographers: Offers a more versatile camera system with a dedicated depth sensor and macro lens, although not as feature rich as the Moto G 5G.
- Audio Enthusiasts: Enhanced audio experience with Dolby Atmos and Digital Plus.
- Users Who Want Future Updates: Newer OS means a longer lifespan for software updates.
- Users who value ergonomics: Side-mounted fingerprint sensor and slightly smaller form factor might be preferred.
Use Cases:
- Motorola Moto G 5G: Playing graphics-intensive games, streaming high-resolution content, editing photos, using AR apps.
- Samsung Galaxy A32 5G: Taking portraits, watching videos, listening to music, using GPS navigation, capturing close-up macro shots.
Price-to-Value:
- Both phones offer good value for their respective price points, but the Moto G 5G offers better raw performance for gamers and those wanting a better display, while the A32 5G gives a more feature-rich camera system, enhanced audio and more future-proof software. The choice depends on what the user prioritizes most.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is raw performance, such as gaming and app loading speed? (Prioritize Moto G 5G for better performance)
- Which is more important: advanced camera features or better camera capabilities? (Choose Moto G 5G for additional camera features, but A32 5G for specific portrait and macro needs)
- How important is future software support and OS upgrades? (Choose A32 5G for more recent Android version with more updates)
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: A user plays games and consumes lots of media on their phone. Recommendation: Motorola Moto G 5G for the superior display and performance.
- Scenario 2: A user wants a reliable, versatile camera experience and enjoys listening to music. Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, for the camera features, enhanced audio and convenience.
- Scenario 3: A user wants a future-proof device that will have up-to-date software for the next few years. Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G for the better OS and more software updates.
Personal Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Motorola Moto G 5G. My reasoning is based on the following:
- Better Performance: As someone who uses my phone for various tasks, including some mobile gaming, the significantly better benchmark scores and the Snapdragon 750G chipset of the Moto G 5G are highly appealing. The Adreno 619 GPU will ensure smoother gaming.
- Superior Display Quality: A crisp, high-resolution display is crucial for my media consumption habits. The 1080p resolution and the IPS LCD will offer a better viewing experience compared to the A32's 720p display and TFT screen.
- Faster Charging: I value a phone with fast charging capabilities for minimal downtime. 20W charging of the Moto G 5G is better than 15W of the A32 5G.
- Acceptable Camera: While the Galaxy A32 5G has a more versatile camera array, including a macro camera and depth sensor, I am willing to trade these for better display and raw power. I also appreciate that Moto G 5G has RAW capabilities.
- Minor Drawbacks: I recognize that the Moto G 5G has slightly older software and misses out on enhanced audio, but these are trade-offs I am willing to make for better overall performance and display quality.
Therefore, for my personal use case, the Motorola Moto G 5G aligns better with my priorities despite being older.
