Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A23
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Launch Date | 2020-12-07 | 2022-03-25 | Galaxy A23 is a newer device, potentially benefiting from more recent software updates and features. |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm, 212g | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm, 195g | The Galaxy A23 is slightly thinner and lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and easier to handle. The Moto G 5G is larger and heavier, possibly feeling bulkier. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.6" | The Moto G 5G offers a slightly larger screen for a more immersive viewing experience. The difference is minimal in everyday use. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | Both displays offer very similar sharpness. The difference is negligible for most users. |
| Pixel Density | 393 PPI | 400 PPI | Both displays offer very similar sharpness. The difference is negligible for most users. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | PLS LCD | The Moto G 5G's IPS LCD generally offers better viewing angles and color accuracy than the PLS LCD of the Galaxy A23. This can be more important when viewing at different angles with multiple viewers. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | The Galaxy A23 has a smoother display due to the higher refresh rate. Scrolling and animations will appear more fluid compared to the Moto G 5G. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have identical peak brightness. Without further data it is hard to make a comparison. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | The Moto G 5G's Snapdragon 750G is more powerful and offers 5G connectivity, leading to faster performance in demanding tasks and future-proofing. The Galaxy A23 will have a slightly lower power consumption |
| AnTuTu Score | 390,000 | 401,000 | Both phones offer very similar performance based on AnTuTu, however the Motorola chip will provide a better and more stable experience. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 | The Moto G 5G's Adreno 619 GPU provides better gaming performance. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | Both phones offer similar battery life. Expect similar endurance for typical use cases. |
| Charging | 20W fast charging | 25W fast charging | The Galaxy A23 charges slightly faster, reducing the time needed to fully recharge the device. |
| Features | Non-removable | Bypass Charging, Non-removable | The Galaxy A23 supports bypass charging, which can help reduce battery wear during gaming or other activities. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear (Main) | 48MP, f/1.7, 0.80µm | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm | The Galaxy A23 offers slightly higher resolution and OIS, which are better in low-light conditions. Moto G 5G offers wider aperture which is also better for low light performance but lacks OIS. |
| Selfie | 16MP, f/2.2, 1.00µm | 8MP, f/2.2 | The Moto G 5G has a higher-resolution front camera, potentially capturing more detail in selfies. |
| Wide Angle lens | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 5MP, f/2.2 | The Moto G 5G has a higher-resolution wide-angle camera which provides greater flexibility when capturing landscapes and group photos. |
| Portrait Mode | N/A | 2MP, f/2.4 | The Galaxy A23 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, while the Moto G 5G lacks this feature. |
| Macro lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm | 2MP, f/2.4 | Both phones have a similar macro lens performance. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps with EIS | The Moto G 5G can record higher resolution 4K videos. The A23 provides higher slow motion fps which is ideal for recording action shots. |
| Camera Features | Triple camera, Digital image stabilization, Laser Autofocus, Night Mode, RAW | Quadruple camera, Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) | Moto G 5G offers better low light performance and manual controls using RAW mode. The Galaxy A23 offers sharper and less shaky videos due to OIS, which is better for beginners. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 (up to 14) | The Galaxy A23 has a newer version of Android and will likely receive longer software support, giving it more modern features. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot, Wi-Fi Display | 802.11ac, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Both phones support similar WiFi standards, however, the Moto G 5G provides Wi-Fi display which is useful when sharing content or mirroring your phone on your screen. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.1, A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, LE, PAN, OPP, PBAP, HOGP, APT-x | The Galaxy A23 has more extensive Bluetooth audio codec and profile support. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | The Galaxy A23 offers wider satellite support which may result in slightly better location accuracy. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64/128 GB | 64/128 GB | Both phones offer the same internal storage options. |
| RAM | 4/6 GB | 4/6 GB | Both phones offer similar RAM options, allowing for smooth multitasking for basic to moderate usage. |
| Expandable | No | No | Both phones do not have expandable storage, meaning you are limited to the selected internal storage option. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | 2 microphones | Basic audio features | The Moto G 5G provides better audio recording capabilities due to the inclusion of dual microphones. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Rear-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side mounted fingerprint sensors are generally considered more convenient and quicker. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | The Samsung Galaxy A23 provides superior screen protection against damage and scratches. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Ultrasonic proximity virtual | The Samsung Galaxy A23 provides more environmental sensor, which is beneficial in advanced gaming or health related apps. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:
- More Powerful Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset offers better performance and 5G connectivity. This is useful for demanding applications, multitasking and gaming.
- Larger Display: The slightly larger screen offers a more immersive viewing experience.
- Better Front and Wide-Angle Cameras: Higher resolutions offer more detailed selfies and wide-angle shots.
- Higher Video Resolution: 4K recording support is useful for capturing higher resolution videos.
- Better Low light performance: Higher aperture and laser autofocus along with RAW support means that pictures taken at night or in low lit environments will be superior to the Samsung Galaxy A23.
- Dual Microphones: Better audio recording capabilities for clearer calls and audio recording.
- Wi-Fi Display: This allows you to share your screen on other compatible devices.
Samsung Galaxy A23 Advantages:
- Newer Device: The A23 is a newer device, benefiting from more recent software.
- Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable to hold and carry around.
- Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate provides a smoother viewing experience.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging compared to the 20W on the Moto G 5G.
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS): Better stability while recording video, resulting in sharper footage.
- Dedicated Depth Sensor: Provides portrait mode for taking pictures with a shallow depth of field.
- Bypass Charging: Reduces battery wear when using while charging.
- Wider Bluetooth Codec and Profile Support: Better compatibility with audio devices and accessories.
- Advanced Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 offers better durability.
- Better Satellite GPS support: More accurate and faster location acquisition.
- Side Mounted Fingerprint sensor: Generally considered faster and more convenient.
- Environmental sensors: Useful for more advanced gaming or health apps.
Trade-offs:
- The Moto G 5G provides superior performance, but it’s bulkier.
- The A23 offers better display smoothness and convenience, but lacks some of the camera features of the Moto G 5G.
- The Moto G 5G has a better camera for low light performance, however lacks video OIS.
- The Moto G 5G has better audio recording, but lacks some of the convenience features of the A23 like side fingerprint and screen protection.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola Moto G 5G Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize performance: Gamers and users who multitask will benefit from the Snapdragon 750G chipset.
- Content creators: Benefit from higher video recording resolution and the higher-resolution wide-angle camera.
- Users looking for better audio recording The dual microphones will result in clearer audio recordings.
- Users who want better low light photography: The wider aperture, laser autofocus, and RAW support will result in better photos in low light conditions.
Samsung Galaxy A23 Ideal User:
- Everyday users: Those who want a reliable phone for daily tasks such as browsing the web, social media, and media consumption will be satisfied.
- Users who prefer a smoother display: The 90Hz refresh rate provides a better experience while browsing.
- Users who want a lighter and more convenient device: The thinner and lighter design makes it easy to hold and carry around.
- Users who take a lot of video: The OIS helps get sharper videos while the side-mounted fingerprint sensor improves convenience.
- Users who want a phone with future proofed software: The Samsung Galaxy A23 has support for the latest Android version with an upgrade to Android 14.
- Users looking for better screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 will provide peace of mind against scratches.
Use Cases:
- Moto G 5G: Ideal for mobile gaming, video editing, photography enthusiasts, and video recording.
- Galaxy A23: Suited for casual social media browsing, everyday communication, media consumption and users who prioritize battery life and convenience.
Price-to-Value Ratio: The Samsung Galaxy A23 is a more recent device and might have a slight price increase, however its features make it a more practical choice for general consumers. The Moto G 5G, with its better processing power, is ideal for gamers or people who prioritize performance.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider:
- Performance Needs: Do you prioritize processing power for gaming and demanding apps (Moto G 5G), or is smoother display experience and battery life more important for daily use (Galaxy A23)?
- Camera Preference: Is capturing high-resolution videos and high-quality low-light photos with RAW support (Moto G 5G) more important, or is video stabilization and convenience with a depth sensor for portrait mode (Galaxy A23) more crucial?
- Physical Design: Do you prefer a slightly larger screen and more powerful phone with a heavier build (Moto G 5G), or a thinner, lighter phone (Galaxy A23)?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1 (Gaming/Performance): If you are a gamer or power user, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the clear choice due to the more powerful processor.
- Scenario 2 (Everyday Use/Media): For those who prioritize a smooth display, longer software support, and a lighter, convenient design, the Samsung Galaxy A23 is the better option.
- Scenario 3 (Photography Focused): If you want superior low light photography with more manual control and higher video quality, then the Motorola G 5G is the better choice. If video stabilization and portrait mode are more important, then the Galaxy A23 is the better option.
My Choice
If I were to choose between the two, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A23.
While the Motorola Moto G 5G offers a more powerful processor, for my typical usage which involves web browsing, social media, and general communication, the performance difference wouldn't be significant. The Galaxy A23's smoother 90Hz display, better screen protection, lighter design and faster charging are features I value more for daily use. Moreover, having a more recent Android version with future upgrades ensures I have access to the latest features and security updates.
The OIS, side-mounted fingerprint sensor, and slightly superior satellite GPS are all additional benefits that would enhance my everyday experience. Although I would have liked to have better audio recording capabilities, I value the other benefits more.
