Motorola Moto G 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 July 1, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 111 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 212 g 195 g
Height 166.1 mm 165.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 83.2 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 45.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mmMotorola is slightly larger and thicker, may feel less comfortable in hand for long use.
Weight212g195gSamsung is lighter, likely more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Motorola offers a slightly larger screen, potentially better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2408Both are very similar; the difference is negligible.
Pixel Density (PPI)393400Both are similar, offering sharp images.
TechnologyIPS LCDPLS LCDMotorola's IPS LCD often offers slightly better viewing angles and color accuracy compared to PLS LCD.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth offer a standard refresh rate for smooth scrolling and basic animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsNeither has brightness information provided.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 750G 5G (8nm)Helio G80 (12nm)Motorola's chipset is significantly more powerful. It will lead to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score390,000200,150Motorola demonstrates significantly higher benchmark scores for better performance.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G52 MC2Motorola's GPU is more powerful. It provides a better gaming experience.
Camera
Main Camera Res48MP (f/1.7)50MP (f/1.8)Samsung offers slightly higher resolution, while Motorola's wider aperture may allow for better low-light shots.
Front Camera Res16MP (f/2.2)8MP (f/2.2)Motorola has much better front camera resolution for higher quality selfies.
Wide Angle Res8MP (f/2.2)5MP (f/2.2)Motorola has a higher resolution wide-angle lens for capturing more detail.
Portrait ModeN/A2MP (f/2.4)Samsung has a dedicated depth sensor, potentially better portrait mode effects.
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4)2MP (f/2.4)Similar macro lens capabilities.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsMotorola offers higher resolution video recording with image stabilization.
Other FeaturesLAF, RAW, Night ModeQuadruple cameraMotorola offers advanced camera features; Samsung has the advantage of an additional lens
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer similar battery capacity.
Charging20W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingSamsung offers faster charging, reducing downtime.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12 (upgradable to 13)Samsung offers a newer OS out-of-the-box and a guaranteed upgrade, meaning access to the latest features and security updates.
Storage
Internal Storage64/128GBN/AMotorola offers 64GB or 128GB storage options.
RAM4/6GBN/AMotorola provides more RAM options for better multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage.
Connectivity
Bluetooth5.1 LE5.2 LESamsung offers a slightly more modern Bluetooth version.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoSamsung offers broader satellite support for better location accuracy.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedSamsung's side-mounted sensor is often more convenient to access.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionN/ACorning Gorilla Glass 5Samsung offers a better screen protection.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a significantly faster and smoother user experience, especially for gaming and multitasking.
  • Better Camera Hardware: Higher resolution front and wide-angle cameras, 4K video recording with EIS, and features like LAF, RAW, and Night Mode enhance photography capabilities.
  • Larger Display: A slightly larger screen provides a more immersive experience for media consumption.
  • More RAM options: Provides 6GB RAM option for more extensive multitasking capabilities.

Practical Implications: The Moto G 5G is designed for users who prioritize performance, camera quality, and a larger screen for media consumption.

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) Advantages:

  • Newer Operating System: Comes with Android 12 (upgradable to 13), providing the latest features and security updates.
  • Faster Charging: Supports 25W fast charging, which reduces charging time compared to the Moto G 5G.
  • Dedicated Depth Camera: Includes a 2MP depth sensor for portrait mode.
  • Better Screen Protection: Equipped with Corning Gorilla Glass 5, providing enhanced scratch and damage resistance.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Often considered more convenient for unlocking the phone.
  • Broader Satellite Support: Supports more satellite systems for potentially better location accuracy.

Practical Implications: The A13 is designed for users who prioritize software, battery convenience and a more durable build, with a slightly more convenient fingerprint sensor.

Trade-offs:

  • Motorola: Lower base storage and no expandable storage, older operating system.
  • Samsung: Less powerful processor and GPU, lower quality front-facing camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G - Ideal User:

  • Gamers: The powerful chipset and GPU will provide a better gaming experience.
  • Media Consumers: The larger screen and better video recording capabilities make it suitable for watching videos and creating content.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Higher resolution cameras, RAW support, and a wider aperture will benefit users who like mobile photography.
  • Performance Users: Those who need fast multitasking and app loading speeds will benefit from the better processor.

Specific Use Cases: Playing graphics-intensive games, recording 4K videos, watching high-resolution content, editing photos, and heavy multitasking with various apps.

Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) - Ideal User:

  • Casual Users: Those who use their phones for basic tasks and prioritize a longer battery life and the latest Android version.
  • Users Concerned About Durability: The Corning Gorilla Glass 5 screen offers improved protection.
  • Users Needing a Convenient Fingerprint Sensor: A side-mounted sensor is generally more accessible for quick unlocking.
  • Users Focused on Portrait Photography: The dedicated depth sensor enhances portrait photos.

Specific Use Cases: Everyday tasks like browsing the internet, social media, using apps, taking portrait photos, and needing a device with longer battery life that is more durable.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Needs: Do you need a phone that handles gaming and heavy multitasking well, or do you primarily use your phone for basic tasks?
  2. Camera Priorities: Do you value higher resolution selfies and advanced photography features (e.g., RAW, night mode), or are you more interested in portrait effects?
  3. Software and Battery: Do you prefer the latest Android version, with a longer software lifespan and faster charging, or is that less of a priority compared to the performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High-Performance Gaming & Media: If you are a gamer or frequently watch high-resolution videos, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the better choice due to its superior processing power and larger screen.
  • Scenario 2: Everyday Use & Reliability: For everyday use, better software support and convenience, the Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) is a more suitable choice due to its newer OS, faster charging, and more durable screen, even with the performance trade off.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Use with Photography Focus: If you want both better performance and slightly better photography features, while the Samsung provides a more durable option the Motorola Moto G 5G is the better option.
  • Scenario 4: Prioritizing a Durable Screen If you are prone to damaging your screen, Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137) offers better protection with Corning Gorilla Glass 5.

Personal Choice

Personally, I would choose the Motorola Moto G 5G. While the Samsung Galaxy A13 has some advantages, such as the newer OS, slightly faster charging, and more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor, the Motorola's superior performance, much better camera, and overall processing power is more important to me. I value the ability to play games smoothly and take higher-quality pictures and videos, even at the expense of a slightly older OS. The performance difference is significant enough to outweigh the advantages the A13 offers for my use cases. The slightly bigger screen is also a plus for media consumption. For me, the user experience is king, and the Motorola offers a significantly smoother and more powerful experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.