Motorola Moto G 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A04s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 September 22, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 114.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 212 g 195 g
Height 166.1 mm 164.7 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 80.7 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 43.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Exynos 850 (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSamsung Galaxy A04sPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mmMotorola is taller and thicker, Samsung is slightly wider. Samsung feels less bulky.
Weight212g195gSamsung is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.7"6.5"Motorola offers a slightly larger viewing area for media and gaming.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Motorola's display is significantly sharper, better for text and images.
PPI393270Motorola's higher pixel density makes for a crisper visual experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDPLS LCDMotorola's IPS LCD generally provides better viewing angles and color accuracy than PLS LCD.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzSamsung provides slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsUnable to assess brightness, both perform similarly (assuming 0 nit is default).
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)Motorola's Snapdragon is significantly more powerful, offering faster performance in apps and games.
AnTuTu Score390,000117,300Motorola offers vastly superior performance for demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G52Motorola's GPU offers better graphics rendering and gaming capabilities.
Camera
Standard Camera Resolution48MP, f/1.750MP, f/1.8Samsung has marginally higher resolution, while Motorola has slightly wider aperture (better in low light).
Selfie Camera Resolution16MP, f/2.25MP, f/2.2Motorola’s selfie camera is significantly higher resolution, leading to better image quality.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2NoneMotorola offers the versatility of wide-angle photography for group photos or landscapes.
Portrait Mode (Depth)None2MP, f/2.4Samsung has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos with background blur.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both offer similar macro capabilities for close-up shots.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsMotorola enables higher quality video recording, suitable for vlogging or high-quality videos.
Video StabilizationEISNoneMotorola offers Electronic Image Stabilization for smoother video footage.
Slow Motion60 fps34 fpsMotorola's slow-motion is smoother due to higher fps.
Camera FeaturesMore features (Laser AF, RAW, Night Mode)Less FeaturesMotorola offers significantly more advanced shooting options for diverse shooting scenarios.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer comparable battery life.
Charging20W15WMotorola offers slightly faster charging for quicker power-ups.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12 (upgradeable to 14)Samsung offers a newer OS version with the latest features and longer software support.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual band802.11a/b/g/n/acMotorola supports dual-band WiFi. Both offer similar speeds, hotspot, and direct options.
Bluetooth5.1, LE, A2DP, EDR5.0, LE, A2DPMotorola has a newer Bluetooth version with EDR (enhanced data rate).
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoSamsung supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB32/64/128 GBBoth offer similar max internal storage but Samsung has more options with a 32 GB base.
RAM4/6 GB3/4 GBMotorola provides a 6GB RAM option for better multitasking than the Samsung.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports microSD card expansion.
Audio
Audio Features2 microphonesBasic audio featuresMotorola has an improved audio capturing with 2 microphones.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedSamsung’s side-mounted sensor is considered to be more modern and ergonomic.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Ultrasonic Proximity Virtual, FingerprintMotorola has more features with Compass and Gyroscope. Samsung offers Ultrasonic Proximity.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset delivers much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance compared to the Exynos 850.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density provide a crisper, more detailed visual experience.
  • Better Cameras: The Motorola has a higher resolution front camera, a wide-angle lens, and more advanced shooting options like RAW and Night Mode, leading to superior photo and video quality.
  • Enhanced Video Recording: Supports 4K video recording at 30fps with EIS, compared to the Samsung’s 1080p, resulting in high-quality video recording.
  • Faster Charging: 20W charging allows for quicker battery top-ups.
  • Improved Audio: Includes 2 microphones for improved audio capturing capabilities.
  • More Sensors: Comes equipped with gyroscope and compass sensors.

Samsung Galaxy A04s Advantages:

  • Newer OS: Comes with Android 12 out of the box, with promised upgrade to Android 14, offering a newer feature set and longer software support.
  • Slightly Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate provides a marginally smoother scrolling experience.
  • Lighter Design: It is more comfortable to hold and carry for extended periods.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Considered to be a more modern and ergonomic solution.
  • More GPS options: Supports more satellite systems (Beidou, QZSS) for potentially more accurate location tracking.
  • Depth Sensor: Provides dedicated depth sensor for portrait photography.

Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola has much better performance but an older version of Android.
  • The Samsung has a more up-to-date OS but significantly lower performance.
  • The Motorola offers a superior camera experience, while the Samsung's camera is more basic.
  • The Motorola is heavier, but the Samsung has a lower resolution display.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G Ideal User:

  • Performance-Oriented Users: Those who prioritize fast app loading, smooth multitasking, and good gaming performance.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with multiple lenses, RAW capture, and enhanced shooting modes.
  • Media Consumers: People who enjoy watching videos, playing games, and appreciate a sharper display.
  • Value Seekers: Those looking for the best performance within their budget with a powerful phone at this price.

Use Cases:

  • Playing demanding mobile games with good frame rates.
  • Editing photos and videos on the go with a powerful performance
  • Taking wide-angle shots of landscapes and group photos.
  • Watching high-resolution videos for a superior viewing experience.

Samsung Galaxy A04s Ideal User:

  • Casual Smartphone Users: Those who primarily use their phone for basic tasks, calls, messaging, and light social media.
  • Users Prioritizing Latest Software: Those who want a phone that has a more up-to-date software with the latest Android features.
  • Budget Conscious Buyers: Users looking for a cost-effective smartphone with a decent basic feature set.
  • Users Prioritizing Comfort and Portability: Those who want a lightweight phone that's easy to handle.

Use Cases:

  • Making calls, sending messages, and basic web browsing.
  • Using social media apps and checking emails.
  • Capturing casual photos and videos with a decent camera.
  • Everyday usage where a lighter phone is preferred.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola Moto G 5G offers a better price-to-value ratio for users who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A04s is more budget-friendly, but with compromises in performance and camera quality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is my primary use for a smartphone? (Gaming/Performance, Media Consumption, Photography, Basic Use)
  2. How important is software update support and having the latest OS? (High priority or not as important?)
  3. Is a lightweight and comfortable design more important than power or camera quality?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance is key. If gaming, multitasking, and responsiveness are crucial, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the clear choice due to its powerful processor and superior benchmarks.
  • Scenario 2: Camera Quality is critical. If you want a phone that can capture high-quality photos and videos, especially in different scenarios, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the better option with more versatile lenses and modes.
  • Scenario 3: Budget and simplicity. If cost is a primary concern, and you primarily need basic smartphone functions with a newer OS, the Samsung Galaxy A04s is a reasonable option but with significant sacrifices in processing speed and camera quality.
  • Scenario 4: Balanced User with a focus on software and ergonomics. If having the latest Android version and a comfortable design is the most important factor, then the Samsung Galaxy A04s would be a better fit even though there are trade-offs with performance and camera quality.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Motorola Moto G 5G. The significantly superior performance, higher-resolution display, more capable cameras, and faster charging make it a more compelling device for my needs. While the Samsung Galaxy A04s is newer and offers a potentially longer software update cycle, the performance disparity is too significant to overlook. I value the overall user experience, and the Motorola’s processing power and versatility would benefit my daily use more. While a newer OS is preferable, the performance gains from the Snapdragon chipset justify choosing the Motorola G 5G.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.