Motorola Moto G 5G vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 212 g 200 g
Height 166.1 mm 169.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 78 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.75 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GNokia C31Practical Impact
Dimensions166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm169.2 x 78 x 8.6 mmNokia C31 is taller and wider, while the Moto G 5G is thicker; the Moto G 5G has slightly larger overall volume, but the C31 might feel less bulky in hand due to being thinner.
Weight212g200gNokia C31 is 12g lighter, which could make a difference during extended use or carrying in a pocket.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones with similar build types.

Display

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GNokia C31Practical Impact
Size6.7"6.75"Negligible size difference; both offer large screens suitable for media consumption.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Motorola Moto G 5G offers a much sharper display with significantly higher pixel density. Text and images appear clearer.
PPI393260Motorola Moto G 5G's higher PPI results in a noticeably crisper viewing experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use the same LCD technology with similar viewing angles and color reproduction characteristics.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzStandard 60Hz refresh rate, typical for phones in this price range; both will have similar motion clarity.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have unknown peak brightness, making it difficult to compare outdoor visibility.

Performance

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GNokia C31Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28nm)The Snapdragon 750G is significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
Antutu Score390,000109,200Motorola Moto G 5G demonstrates substantially higher performance in benchmarks, indicating a major difference in overall processing power.
GPUAdreno 619IMG8322Adreno 619 in the Moto G 5G offers superior graphics performance for gaming and other graphically intensive tasks.

Camera

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GNokia C31Practical Impact
Main Camera48MP (f/1.7, 0.8µm)13MPMotorola Moto G 5G captures much more detail and generally performs better in low light conditions.
Selfie Camera16MP (f/2.2, 1.0µm)5MP (f/2.2)Moto G 5G offers much sharper and detailed selfies.
Wide-Angle Lens8MP (f/2.2, 1.12µm)Not AvailableMotorola Moto G 5G provides the flexibility to capture more in each shot.
Portrait Mode (Depth)Not Available2MP (f/2.4)Nokia C31 can create depth-of-field effects in portrait shots.
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4, 1.75µm)2MP (f/2.4)Similar macro capabilities, allowing close-up shots of small objects.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsMotorola Moto G 5G can record higher-resolution videos, offering better quality and clarity for video content creation and storage.
Video FeaturesEIS, Slow-motion 60fpsNone, Slow-motion 30fpsMotorola Moto G 5G benefits from digital video stabilization and better slow-motion recording.
Additional Camera FeaturesLaser autofocus (LAF), RAW, Night ModeFront FlashMoto G 5G has more advanced focusing and night photography features, while the C31 has a front flash to improve selfie in low light

Battery

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GNokia C31Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5050mAhVery similar battery sizes suggest comparable battery life, depending on usage patterns.
Charging20W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingMotorola Moto G 5G charges much faster, reducing downtime needed for charging.
TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerBattery chemistry differences typically don't have a major impact on the user experience.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a vastly superior experience in terms of app loading, multitasking, and gaming compared to the Unisoc chip in the Nokia C31.
  • Superior Display: The higher resolution and pixel density result in a much sharper and more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Better Camera System: The 48MP main camera, 16MP selfie camera, and included wide-angle lens significantly outperform the Nokia C31's camera setup. It also offers additional features like laser autofocus and Night Mode.
  • Faster Charging: 20W charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More Advanced Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi standards, and Bluetooth 5.1.
  • More Comprehensive Sensor Suite: Includes gyroscope and compass which are useful for some games and applications.

Nokia C31 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Comes with Android 12 out of the box, while the Moto G 5G is on Android 10.
  • Lighter Design: The Nokia C31 is slightly lighter, which may be more comfortable for some users.
  • Depth Camera: Offers portrait mode which might appeal to those focused on photography effects.
  • Front Flash: Might be useful in taking selfies in dark conditions.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Simplicity: The Motorola Moto G 5G provides much better performance at the expense of slightly higher weight and an older Android version.
  • Camera Quality vs. Camera Features: The Moto G 5G takes better quality photos and has a wide-angle lens, whereas the Nokia C31 has a depth sensor and front flash.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G Ideal Users:

  • Performance-Oriented Users: Those who need a phone that can handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications smoothly.
  • Media Consumers: Users who watch a lot of videos, browse social media, and appreciate a sharp, detailed screen.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who prioritize image quality, flexibility, and the ability to take high-quality videos.
  • Users who want a device that can last longer: The faster processor and the better display may make the device more future proof.

Nokia C31 Ideal Users:

  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users looking for a more affordable phone for basic tasks.
  • Users Who Prefer a Simpler UI and newer OS: The Nokia C31 runs a newer version of Android, possibly with a more simple UI.
  • Users Who Mostly Use Social Media and Text: Those who need a phone mainly for basic communication and social media without complex tasks.
  • Users Looking for a Lightweight Device: Users who prioritize a light and thin phone for easy handling.

Use Cases:

  • Motorola Moto G 5G: Gaming, streaming high-resolution videos, taking high-quality photos and videos, multitasking between multiple apps, and using demanding productivity applications.
  • Nokia C31: Making calls, texting, browsing social media, taking casual photos, basic navigation, and using basic applications.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola Moto G 5G provides a significant value for its performance, display, and camera, making it a superior option for the price if performance is key.
  • The Nokia C31 may be a viable option if budget is a top priority and the user has minimal requirements in terms of performance and camera.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance to you? If smooth multitasking, gaming, and overall speed are priorities, the Motorola Moto G 5G is a clear winner.
  2. How important is camera quality and flexibility? If you want better photos and the flexibility of a wide angle lens, then Moto G 5G is preferable. If you need a front flash and portrait mode, then the Nokia C31 is a better fit.
  3. How important is software and future updates? The Nokia C31 comes with a newer version of Android and may receive updates for longer.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Need a reliable, fast phone for everyday tasks, entertainment, and photography.

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G 5G. It provides a superior overall experience with its display, camera, and performance.
  • Scenario 2: Have a limited budget and only need a phone for basic communication and social media.

    • Recommendation: Nokia C31. It offers a more affordable option with a simple, functional design.
  • Scenario 3: Want the best possible camera experience.

    • Recommendation: Motorola Moto G 5G. The 48MP camera, wide angle, and video capabilities make it far superior.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Moto G 5G. While the Nokia C31 is a newer device with a lighter design and a newer OS, the performance difference between the two is too big to ignore. The Moto G 5G offers a substantially better experience in almost every other way including display, camera, processing power and charging speed. Although the older version of Android on the Motorola Moto G 5G is a consideration, it doesn't outweigh the huge improvements in performance and image quality, which are the key aspects that impact daily usage. This makes it the clear winner for me as a phone which is more enjoyable and functional to use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.