Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 September 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 106.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 189 g 199 g
Height 164 mm 161.4 mm
Width 75 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Midnight Black (Fushion Black)
  • Moonlight White (Fushion White)
  • Aurora Purple
  • Fushion Purple
  • Camo Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G610 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9Redmi is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)189199Redmi is slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+Redmi offers significantly better contrast, colors, and peak brightness due to AMOLED technology and HDR support. Moto G's 120Hz refresh rate makes both phones feel smooth.
Size (inches)6.56.67Redmi has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution720 x 16001220 x 2712Redmi has a much sharper display with significantly higher pixel density (446 ppi vs 270 ppi). Images and text will be crisper on the Redmi.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm)Redmi's Dimensity chip offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to its more advanced architecture and manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Redmi has a more powerful CPU, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G610 MC4Redmi boasts a more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM4GB8GB/12GB/16GBRedmi offers significantly more RAM, leading to superior multitasking capabilities and less frequent app reloading.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.7200MP, f/1.65, OISRedmi has a much higher resolution sensor with OIS, likely resulting in significantly better detail, low-light performance, and video stabilization.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with EISRedmi offers much higher resolution video recording with electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, but Redmi's more efficient chip might result in longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Likely more affordable than the Redmi Note 13 Pro+.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Display: Brighter, sharper, more vibrant AMOLED with HDR support.
  • Much Better Performance: Faster processor, more powerful GPU, and more RAM for smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Superior Camera System: Higher resolution main sensor with OIS, capable of 4K video recording.
  • More Advanced Features: NFC for mobile payments.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ comes at a higher price for its superior features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023):

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality (calling, texting, web browsing, social media) and don't demand high performance or advanced features.
  • Use Cases: Casual use, light web browsing, social media, basic photography.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+:

  • Ideal User: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, a good camera, and advanced features like NFC. Gamers, mobile photographers, and power users would appreciate this phone.
  • Use Cases: Demanding mobile gaming, high-quality photography and videography, content creation, multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G is a budget-friendly option, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Moto G suffices. For demanding tasks and multimedia consumption, the Redmi is better.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize display quality, performance, camera, or battery life according to your needs.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+

While the Motorola Moto G (2023) offers a budget-friendly option, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ provides a significantly better overall experience. The superior AMOLED display, much more powerful processor and GPU, increased RAM, advanced camera system with OIS, and inclusion of NFC justify the higher price. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a future-proof device capable of handling demanding tasks and providing a premium user experience. The significant jump in performance, camera quality, and display technology make it a worthwhile investment for most users beyond those strictly seeking the absolute lowest price.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.