Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 189 g 205 g
Height 164 mm 168.6 mm
Width 75 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Pink
  • Ocean Blue
  • Sandy Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.79 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 550 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Xiaomi Redmi 13Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi 13 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)189205Moto G (2023) is noticeably lighter for one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.79Redmi 13 offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2460Redmi 13 has a significantly sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Moto G (2023)'s higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use LCD technology, but Redmi 13's LTPS variant might offer slightly better color accuracy and power efficiency. This is not confirmed as screen brightness specs are missing for comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GMediaTek Helio G91 UltraRedmi 13's chipset is generally considered more powerful for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)While core counts are similar, architectural differences likely favor the Redmi 13 in performance.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G52 MC2Redmi 13's GPU should offer better gaming performance.
RAM4GB8GBRedmi 13 has double the RAM, enabling better multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)48108Redmi 13 boasts a much higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail. Real-world image quality depends on sensor and processing, which are not fully detailed.
Selfie Camera (MP)813Redmi 13 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer similar basic video recording capabilities. Redmi 13 specs mention 120fps slow-motion, but resolution is not specified.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005030Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage.
Other
NFCNoYesRedmi 13 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Price RangeMediumLowRedmi 13 offers significantly better value for its price.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: Easier for one-handed use and portability.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother user experience for scrolling and animations.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Advantages:

  • Sharper and larger display: More immersive media consumption and better viewing experience.
  • Significantly more powerful: Better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • More RAM: Superior multitasking capabilities.
  • Higher resolution cameras: Potential for more detailed photos and videos. (Dependent on unspecified sensor and processing quality).
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • Lower price: Offers excellent value for its specifications.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023):

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing a lightweight phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and web browsing. Users sensitive to motion smoothness will appreciate the 120Hz display.
  • Use Cases: Casual social media, light web browsing, making calls, and sending texts.

Xiaomi Redmi 13:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a well-rounded phone with a large, sharp display, strong performance for gaming and multitasking, and good camera capabilities at an affordable price.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, media consumption (videos, photos), multitasking, photography enthusiasts on a budget.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi 13 provides significantly better value in the low price range.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and media consumption favor the Redmi 13, while basic tasks with a focus on portability favor the Moto G (2023).
  3. Is NFC important to you? If contactless payments are essential, the Redmi 13 is the only option.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi 13

The Redmi 13 offers a compelling combination of performance, display quality, features (like NFC), and an attractive price point. While the Moto G (2023) has its strengths in portability and a smooth display, the Redmi 13's overall package is significantly more appealing. The larger, sharper display, more powerful processor, increased RAM, and higher resolution camera make it a clear winner in terms of value and versatility. Even if ultimate portability is desired, the tradeoffs in performance and features on the Moto G (2023) are too significant given the Redmi 13's lower price.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.