Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 98.95 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 189 g 209 g
Height 164 mm 160.9 mm
Width 75 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 89 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 526 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 700 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 50.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Xiaomi Poco F6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4160.9 x 75 x 8.2Poco F6 Pro is slightly shorter and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)189209Poco F6 Pro is noticeably heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+Poco F6 Pro offers significantly better contrast, color accuracy, and HDR support resulting in a superior viewing experience.
Display Size (inches)6.56.67Poco F6 Pro has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution720 x 16001440 x 3200Much sharper and more detailed visuals on the Poco F6 Pro due to significantly higher resolution.
PPI270526Significantly higher pixel density on the Poco F6 Pro, resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak BrightnessNot specified4000 nitsPoco F6 Pro offers superior outdoor visibility with its much higher peak brightness. Moto G's brightness is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Poco F6 Pro boasts a vastly more powerful processor, enabling significantly smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)The Poco F6 Pro's CPU architecture offers superior performance and efficiency.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 740A significantly more powerful GPU in the Poco F6 Pro translates to a much better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
RAM4GB12GB/16GBMuch more RAM in the Poco F6 Pro enables seamless multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera48MP50MP (Omnivision OV50E)Both offer high megapixel counts, but sensor quality and processing will determine the actual image quality. Poco F6 Pro likely benefits from a larger sensor (1/1.55").
UltrawideNot specified8MPPoco F6 Pro offers ultrawide photography, expanding creative possibilities.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@24fpsPoco F6 Pro offers significantly higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and hardware efficiency. The more powerful and brighter display of the Poco F6 Pro may drain the battery faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Likely more affordable than the Poco F6 Pro.
  • Lighter Weight: Easier for one-handed use.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: Superior CPU, GPU, and RAM for a smoother and faster user experience.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED with HDR, higher resolution, and brightness for a better viewing experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes an ultrawide lens and higher resolution video recording.
  • More Feature Rich: NFC for contactless payments. Newer Bluetooth and Wifi standards.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023): Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Not recommended for demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and a versatile camera system. Ideal for mobile gamers, content creators, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G (2023) is expected to be significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For basic tasks, the Moto G might suffice. For demanding tasks, the Poco F6 Pro is necessary.
  3. How important is display quality? The Poco F6 Pro's AMOLED display offers a significant advantage.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro

While the Motorola Moto G (2023) might be a decent budget option, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro offers a vastly superior overall experience. The significantly improved performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and future-proof features (like newer Wifi standards) justify the higher price for me. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to handle demanding tasks without lag. The Poco F6 Pro delivers on all these fronts. While heavier, the benefits greatly outweigh this minor drawback for my usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.