Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 February 22, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 111.81 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 2.93 "/g
Weight 189 g 229.5 g
Height 164 mm 161.4 mm
Width 75 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Titanium Gray
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.73 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 90 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 522 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 44.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Xiaomi 14 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4161.4 x 75.3 x 9.2Xiaomi 14 Ultra is slightly shorter, narrower, but thicker and noticeably heavier. Moto G (2023) is more pocketable.
Weight (g)189229.5Significant weight difference; Moto G (2023) is much lighter for comfortable one-handed use.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials unknown for both, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzLTPO AMOLED, 120HzXiaomi offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO. Brighter outdoors.
Display Size (inches)6.56.73Xiaomi offers a slightly larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001440 x 3200Significantly sharper and more detailed visuals on the Xiaomi with much higher pixel density.
Peak BrightnessUnspecified3000 nitsXiaomi's display will be far more visible in direct sunlight. Missing Moto G brightness limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8 Gen 3Massive performance difference. Xiaomi will handle demanding tasks and gaming far better.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Xiaomi's CPU offers significantly higher clock speeds and a more powerful architecture for faster processing.
RAM4GB16GBXiaomi offers much more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 750Xiaomi's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera48MP50MP (1-inch sensor)Xiaomi boasts a larger sensor, promising superior low-light performance and depth of field.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsXiaomi offers substantially higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Camera FeaturesBasicAdvanced (Leica lens, OIS, variable aperture)Xiaomi offers significantly more advanced camera features for professional-grade photography and videography.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and display efficiency. Xiaomi's brighter, higher resolution display will likely consume more power.
Charging SpeedUnspecifiedUnspecifiedCharging speed comparison impossible without specific data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Xiaomi 14 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 16GB RAM, Adreno 750 GPU provide flagship-level speed and responsiveness.
  • Advanced Camera System: Larger sensor, Leica optics, variable aperture, OIS, and 8K video recording.
  • High-Quality Display: Sharper, brighter AMOLED with HDR10+ and Dolby Vision support.

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier for one-handed use and portability.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Xiaomi 14 Ultra: Power users, photography enthusiasts, content creators, gamers, those who demand the best display and performance.

Motorola Moto G (2023): Budget-conscious users, casual users prioritizing affordability and portability over top-tier specs, individuals seeking a reliable basic smartphone.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Xiaomi is considerably more expensive.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? (e.g., gaming, photography, social media, basic communication).
  3. Do you prioritize performance and features or affordability and portability?

My Choice:

I would choose the Xiaomi 14 Ultra. While significantly more expensive, the performance, camera, and display quality are in a different league. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and 16GB RAM future-proof the device for several years. The advanced camera system with its 1-inch sensor and Leica lens makes it a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts. As someone who values a high-quality display and smooth performance, the Xiaomi's superior AMOLED and powerful hardware are major draws. While the Moto G (2023) offers excellent value for its price, it's ultimately a compromise on performance and features. I am willing to pay the premium for a significant upgrade in overall experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.