Motorola Moto G (2023) vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 189 g 195 g
Height 164 mm 168.2 mm
Width 75 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 86 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)TCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4168.2 x 75.5 x 8.1TCL 50 SE is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)189195Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.78TCL 50 SE offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2460TCL 50 SE has a significantly sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Moto G (2023) offers smoother scrolling and animations, though the difference might not be noticeable for all users.
PPI270396TCL 50 SE's higher pixel density results in sharper text and images.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GMediaTek Helio G88Both are budget chipsets, but Snapdragon 480+ generally offers better power efficiency and 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Performance differences will likely be minimal in everyday tasks.
RAM (GB)46TCL 50 SE has more RAM, potentially enabling better multitasking. Although the provided specs only mention 4GB for TCL, its "phoneVersions" indicates a 6GB/256GB version.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850TCL 50 SE boasts slightly higher resolution, but image quality depends on factors beyond megapixel count.
Front Camera (MP)88Same resolution; practical selfie quality will depend on sensor and software processing, which are not fully detailed here.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005010Negligible difference in battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage patterns and software optimization.
Other
NFCNoYesTCL 50 SE supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
OSAndroid 13Android 14TCL 50 SE comes with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security updates.
Price RangeMediumMediumWhile both are mid-range, the specific prices within that range are crucial for determining value. Provided prices show significant variation depending on retailer and storage configuration.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid user experience.
  • 5G Connectivity: Offers faster mobile data speeds in areas with 5G coverage.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Depending on the specific configuration, the Moto G (2023) could be more affordable.

TCL 50 SE Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density deliver a significantly better visual experience.
  • Larger Display: Provides more screen real estate for multimedia and multitasking.
  • More RAM: 6GB RAM allows for smoother multitasking and app switching. Note: this assumes the 6GB/256GB version is being compared.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • Newer Android Version: Offers the latest features and security updates.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023): Budget-conscious users who prioritize 5G connectivity and a smooth display over absolute screen sharpness. Ideal for:

  • Casual users: Web browsing, social media, basic gaming.
  • Users in areas with strong 5G coverage: Taking advantage of faster download and streaming speeds.

TCL 50 SE: Users who value a large, sharp display and prioritize multimedia consumption. Ideal for:

  • Media enthusiasts: Watching videos, playing games, browsing photos.
  • Users who multitask frequently: Switching between apps seamlessly.
  • Users who rely on contactless payments: Utilizing NFC for transactions.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is 5G connectivity a priority? If yes, the Moto G (2023) is the clear choice.
  2. How important is display quality? If a sharp, large display is crucial, the TCL 50 SE is superior.
  3. What is your budget? Compare specific prices for the desired storage configurations before making a decision.

My Choice: TCL 50 SE

While the Moto G (2023) offers 5G and a smoother refresh rate, the TCL 50 SE's significantly better display (sharper and larger), larger RAM, NFC functionality, and newer Android version make it a more compelling overall package for me. I prioritize display quality and future-proofing through software updates, and the TCL 50 SE delivers in those areas. The slightly larger size isn't a significant drawback for me. The lack of specific pricing makes a definitive value judgment difficult, but assuming similar price points within the "medium" range, the TCL 50 SE offers more for the money.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.