Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 August 11, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 122.74 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3 "/g
Weight 189 g 253 g
Height 164 mm 154.9 mm
Width 75 mm 129.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 6.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Blue
  • Phantom Black
  • Gray
  • Cream
  • Icy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 7.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1812 x 2176
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 91.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 373 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 76.18 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 35.85 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4154.9 x 129.9 x 6.1 (folded)Fold5 significantly more compact when folded, but thicker. Moto G is a traditional candybar design.
Weight (g)189253Fold5 noticeably heavier due to folding mechanism and larger display.
FoldableNoYesFold5 offers a larger screen in a pocketable size and unique multitasking capabilities. Moto G is more traditional.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+Fold5 boasts superior contrast, brightness, and color accuracy with HDR10+ support. Moto G's LCD is less vibrant.
Size (inches)6.57.6 (main), 6.2 (cover)Fold5 offers a significantly larger main display for immersive content consumption. Moto G has a standard size.
Resolution720 x 16002176 x 1812 (main), 2316 x 904 (cover)Fold5 has much sharper displays due to higher resolution. Moto G's display is noticeably less sharp.
PPI270373 (main), 401 (cover)Fold5 displays are significantly sharper and more detailed.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both phones offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the high refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Fold5 offers vastly superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming. Moto G is suited for basic usage.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz & 2x2.8 GHz & 2x2.8 GHz & 3x2.0 GHz)Fold5 has a much faster and more efficient CPU architecture.
RAM (GB)412Fold5 offers significantly more RAM for multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Camera48MP Main, 2MP Macro50MP Main, 12MP Ultrawide, 10MP TelephotoFold5 features a more versatile camera system with higher resolution sensors and optical zoom.
Video Recording1080p@30fps8K@30fpsFold5 capable of significantly higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004400Moto G has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life for basic usage. Fold5's larger, higher resolution display will consume more power.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Longer Battery Life (Potential): Larger battery capacity.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and more RAM.
  • High-Quality Display: Foldable AMOLED with HDR10+ for vibrant visuals.
  • Versatile Camera System: Multiple lenses including ultrawide and telephoto.
  • Innovative Foldable Design: Larger screen real estate in a compact form factor.
  • Premium Features: NFC, faster charging, newer Bluetooth and Wifi standards.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: Fold5 is significantly more expensive.
  • Battery Life: Fold5's battery may drain faster due to the demanding display.
  • Durability: Foldable phones have more potential points of failure.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G (2023): Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and casual media consumption.

Fold5: Power users, multitaskers, content creators, and tech enthusiasts who value cutting-edge technology, top-tier performance, and a unique form factor.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget?
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns?
  3. Do you value innovation and cutting-edge technology or prioritize affordability and simplicity?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Moto G (2023)
  • Demanding Tasks, Multimedia Consumption, Innovation: Fold5

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

While the Moto G (2023) offers good value for its price, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is the clear winner for me. The foldable design, superior performance, stunning display, and versatile camera system are compelling. I value the ability to multitask efficiently, consume content on a large, high-quality screen, and capture high-quality photos and videos. While the price is significantly higher, the Fold5 offers a transformative user experience that justifies the premium. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's significantly improved performance over the Snapdragon 480+, coupled with the massive RAM difference, makes the Fold5 a future-proof choice for demanding applications and multitasking. The larger, brighter, sharper AMOLED screen is crucial for media consumption and productivity. Ultimately, the Fold5's innovative features and premium experience align better with my needs and preferences.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.