Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 January 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 110.27 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 2.93 "/g
Weight 189 g 232 g
Height 164 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75 mm 79 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Titanium Gray
  • Titanium Blue
  • Titanium Black
  • Titanium Violet
  • Titanium Yellow
  • Titanium Green
  • Titanium Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1440 x 3120
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 88.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 505 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 2600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 45.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 750 (1 GHz)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.2
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4162.3 x 79 x 8.6S24 Ultra slightly shorter and narrower, but marginally thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)189232Moto G significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedUnable to compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzDynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120HzS24 Ultra offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially higher brightness with AMOLED technology. Both have smooth scrolling with 120Hz refresh rate.
Display Size (inches)6.56.8S24 Ultra provides a larger viewing area for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001440 x 3120S24 Ultra boasts much sharper visuals due to significantly higher resolution (almost 4x pixel density).
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified2600S24 Ultra's exceptional peak brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility. Moto G's brightness is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8 Gen 3S24 Ultra dramatically outperforms in processing power and graphics rendering, enabling seamless multitasking, demanding gaming, and faster app loading.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)S24 Ultra has a significantly more powerful and efficient CPU architecture.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 750S24 Ultra provides a substantial leap in graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive tasks.
RAM4GB12GBS24 Ultra offers significantly more RAM for smoother multitasking and background app management.
Camera
Main Camera48MP200MPS24 Ultra offers higher resolution and potentially better low-light performance. Practical differences in image quality depend on sensor size, processing algorithms, and other factors not specified for Moto G.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsS24 Ultra supports significantly higher video resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and power efficiency of each device.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower price: Offers a budget-friendly option.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly higher performance: Handles demanding tasks and gaming with ease.
  • Superior display: Brighter, sharper, and more vibrant visuals.
  • More advanced camera system: Higher resolution sensors and more video recording capabilities.
  • More Feature-rich: NFC for mobile payments and more advanced connectivity options.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The S24 Ultra is considerably more expensive.
  • Weight: The S24 Ultra is heavier, potentially leading to hand fatigue.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G (2023): Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, and light social media use.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: Ideal for power users, gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who demand the best performance and features. Excellent for content creation, multitasking, and demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G is a budget option, while the S24 Ultra is a premium flagship.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important are display quality and camera performance? The S24 Ultra excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

While the Moto G (2023) offers a budget-friendly option, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the clear winner for me. The significantly superior performance, stunning display, advanced camera system, and feature-rich experience justify the higher price. I prioritize a smooth and powerful user experience, high-quality visuals for media consumption, and advanced camera capabilities for capturing photos and videos. The S24 Ultra delivers on all fronts. While the weight is a minor drawback, it's a trade-off I'm willing to make for the overall superior package. The longevity offered by the powerful hardware and expected software updates makes it a more valuable investment in the long run.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.