Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 189 g 213 g
Height 164 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly smaller, thinner
Weight (g)189213Moto G noticeably lighter
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+A55 offers superior contrast, vibrant colors, and HDR support for better media consumption
Display Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible size difference
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340A55 significantly sharper, clearer text and images
PPI270~400A55 much sharper; Moto G may show pixelation
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)Exynos 1480 (4 nm)A55 has a more powerful and efficient processor, leading to smoother multitasking and better performance in demanding apps
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55's CPU architecture offers significantly better performance
GPUAdreno 619Xclipse 530A55 boasts superior graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive tasks
RAM4GB8GB/12GBA55 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and app switching
OSAndroid 13Android 14A55 ships with a newer OS version, potentially offering more features and longer software support
Camera
Rear Camera48MP Main, 2MP Macro50MP Main (OIS), 13MP Ultrawide, 5MP MacroA55 provides a more versatile camera system with optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and an ultrawide lens
Front Camera8MP32MPA55 offers a much higher resolution selfie camera
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps with EISA55 capable of recording higher resolution video with electronic image stabilization
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds
Other
NFCNoYesA55 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Lighter: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Potentially More Affordable: Depending on the specific variant and retailer, the Moto G might be cheaper.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and HDR10+ support deliver a far better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful processor, GPU, and more RAM translate to a smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: OIS on the main camera, an ultrawide lens, and higher resolution sensors result in significantly better photos and videos.
  • Newer Software with Longer Support: Ships with Android 14 and is likely to receive more software updates for longer.
  • NFC Support: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023):

  • Budget-conscious users: For users primarily focused on basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and light app usage.
  • Users prioritizing lightness: Its lighter weight makes it suitable for users who dislike heavy phones.

Samsung Galaxy A55:

  • Users seeking a well-rounded experience: Offers a great balance of performance, camera quality, display, and features.
  • Mobile gamers and multimedia enthusiasts: The powerful hardware and excellent display make it ideal for gaming and watching videos.
  • Photography enthusiasts: The versatile camera system with OIS and ultrawide lens allows for capturing high-quality photos and videos.
  • Users who value software updates and future-proofing: Likely to receive longer software support than the Moto G.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G is likely to be more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding apps, gaming, multimedia consumption.
  3. How important are camera quality, display quality, and performance? The A55 excels in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Motorola Moto G (2023) offers a lighter weight and potential cost savings, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a significantly better overall device. The superior display, significantly improved performance, more versatile camera system, newer software with longer update support, and NFC functionality make it a much more compelling choice for most users. The price difference is justifiable considering the substantial improvements in key areas that significantly impact the user experience. The A55 offers a more future-proof device that will likely provide a better experience over its lifespan.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.