Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 189 g 185 g
Height 164 mm 164.6 mm
Width 75 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Realme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6Realme C65 is slightly larger but thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)189185Virtually identical weight.
Build MaterialNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.67Realme C65 offers a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1604Nearly identical resolution; both are HD+ and will appear similarly sharp.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Moto G (2023)'s 120Hz display will feel smoother for scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good color reproduction and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GMediaTek Helio G85Snapdragon 480+ generally offers better power efficiency and slightly improved CPU performance, but Helio G85 might have a slight edge in GPU tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Comparable CPU performance; differences will be minor in most applications.
RAM (GB)48Realme C65's 8GB RAM allows for smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding apps.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 might offer slightly better gaming performance. Adreno 619 generally has better driver support.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Realme C65 has a higher megapixel count, but image quality depends on factors beyond resolution.
Front Camera (MP)88Identical front camera resolution.
Camera FeaturesDigital Zoom, Dual CameraDigital Zoom, Dual CameraFeature sets are similar, however Realme C65 offers 120 fps slow-motion video recording which is missing in Moto G.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare charging speeds without this information.
Other
NFCNoYesRealme C65 supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Realme C65 ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • 120Hz Refresh Rate: Smoother display experience.
  • Potentially Better Power Efficiency: Due to the Snapdragon 480+ chip.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Larger RAM: Better multitasking and performance with demanding applications.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and data transfer.
  • Newer Android Version: Likely to receive longer software updates and potentially has newer features.
  • Slightly Better GPU: Mali-G52 might provide a slight advantage in gaming scenarios.
  • Slow Motion Video: Offers 120fps slow-motion video recording.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023): Suitable for users prioritizing a smooth display experience and basic smartphone functionality on a budget. Best for casual users who primarily use their phone for web browsing, social media, and light tasks.

Realme C65: Ideal for users who value multitasking, mobile gaming, and NFC functionality. The larger RAM and newer Android version also make it a better choice for long-term use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is a smooth display experience a top priority? If yes, the Moto G (2023)'s 120Hz display is a strong advantage.
  2. Do you frequently multitask or use demanding applications? If yes, the Realme C65's 8GB RAM will provide a better experience.
  3. Is NFC essential for your usage? If yes, the Realme C65 is the only option.

My Choice: Realme C65

While the Moto G (2023)'s 120Hz display is appealing, the Realme C65 offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. The 8GB RAM is crucial for smooth multitasking, and NFC is essential for contactless payments. The newer Android version promises longer software support. While specific benchmarks are missing, the Helio G85 with the Mali-G52 MC2 should provide adequate performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. The slightly larger screen is a bonus. The lack of detailed camera sensor specifications makes a definitive camera quality comparison difficult, but the presence of slow-motion video recording in Realme C65 adds value. Overall, the Realme C65 provides greater value and future-proofing.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.