Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Nothing Phone (2) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 July 17, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 106.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 189 g 201.2 g
Height 164 mm 162.1 mm
Width 75 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • White
  • Dark Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 87.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 44.13 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Nothing Phone (2)Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4162.1 x 76.4 x 8.6Virtually identical in size; negligible real-world difference.
Weight (g)189201.2Nothing Phone (2) is slightly heavier, potentially noticeable in prolonged use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare without information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDLTPO OLEDOLED offers significantly better contrast, black levels, and potentially power efficiency due to individual pixel illumination.
Display Size (inches)6.56.7Slightly larger screen on the Nothing Phone (2) offers more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16001080 x 2412Much sharper and clearer visuals on the Nothing Phone (2) due to higher resolution. Noticeably improved detail in text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified1600Missing brightness spec for Moto G makes outdoor visibility comparison impossible. Nothing Phone's 1600 nits ensures excellent sunlight readability.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Significantly faster and more powerful performance on the Nothing Phone (2) for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz & 3x2.5 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)Faster clock speeds and superior architecture on Nothing Phone (2) translate to a smoother, more responsive user experience.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 730Much more powerful GPU in Nothing Phone (2) allows for higher graphics settings and smoother frame rates in games.
RAM (GB)412More RAM in the Nothing Phone (2) enables better multitasking and prevents apps from closing in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Resolution difference is minor.
SensorUnspecifiedSony IMX890Cannot fully compare without Moto G sensor details. The Sony sensor on the Nothing Phone (2) is generally a positive indicator of image quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@60fps with HDR, OIS, EISSignificantly better video recording capabilities on the Nothing Phone (2) due to higher resolution, frame rate, HDR, and stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004700Slightly larger battery on the Moto G (2023). However, real-world battery life depends on many factors including display type and processor efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity might translate to longer usage time, although this is not guaranteed.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in a lower price bracket.

Nothing Phone (2) Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a vastly improved user experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: The OLED display offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
  • Better Camera Features: Notably better video recording capabilities and a higher-quality main sensor.
  • More RAM: Enables smoother multitasking and better overall performance.

Trade-offs:

  • The Nothing Phone (2) is more expensive but offers significantly upgraded features.
  • The Moto G (2023)'s larger battery might offer longer battery life, but this needs further testing to confirm.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023): Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Excellent for users who need a long-lasting battery and don't engage in demanding tasks.

Nothing Phone (2): Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation. Also suited for users who value a high-quality display and camera experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G (2023) is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding games and applications.
  3. How important is display quality and camera performance? The Nothing Phone (2) significantly outperforms the Moto G in these areas.

My Choice: Nothing Phone (2)

While the Motorola Moto G (2023) offers a larger battery and lower price, the Nothing Phone (2)'s superior performance, stunning display, and enhanced camera capabilities make it the clear winner for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, a high-quality display for media consumption, and the ability to run demanding applications without lag. The price difference is justified by the significant upgrade in overall quality and features. The Moto G (2023) serves as a great budget option, but the Nothing Phone (2) offers a significantly better overall user experience for a moderate price increase. The lack of key specs on the Moto G, like display brightness and camera sensor details, further hindered a complete comparison.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.