Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Nokia G42 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G42
Nokia G42
Nokia

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 June 28, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 107.56 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 189 g 193.8 g
Height 164 mm 165 mm
Width 75 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Red
  • Purple
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.56 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 46.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Nokia G42Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4165 x 75.8 x 8.6Nokia G42 slightly larger, negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)189193.8Nokia G42 slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.56Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Nearly identical resolution; both offer similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Moto G (2023) offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar color accuracy and viewing angles, typical of IPS LCDs.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 480+ 5GIdentical chipsets provide comparable performance and 5G connectivity.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Same CPU architecture results in similar processing power.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619Identical GPUs should deliver similar gaming performance.
RAM4GB4GB/6GB/8GBNokia G42 offers configurations with more RAM, potentially improving multitasking and app loading times.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850Nokia G42 boasts slightly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. However, real-world image quality depends on factors beyond resolution.
Other CamerasMacro 2MP, Selfie 8MPMacro 2MP, Depth Sensor 2MP, Selfie 8MPNokia G42 adds a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, which may improve background blur. The practical benefit might be limited given the low resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer basic video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have identical battery capacities, expecting similar battery life with variations based on individual usage patterns.
Other
NFCNoYesNokia G42 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC, which the Moto G (2023) lacks.
OS UpdatesUp to Android 13Up to Android 14Nokia G42 guaranteed one more major OS update, ensuring longer software support and security updates.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: The 120Hz display provides a noticeably smoother user experience for scrolling, animations, and gaming compared to the 90Hz display on the Nokia G42.

Nokia G42 Advantages:

  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.
  • More RAM Options: Offers configurations with 6GB and 8GB RAM, enabling better multitasking performance compared to the 4GB on the Moto G (2023).
  • Guaranteed Android 14 Update: Ensures longer software support and security updates.
  • Slightly Higher Resolution Main Camera: The 50MP main camera might offer marginally better detail in photos compared to the 48MP sensor on the Moto G (2023), although real-world differences could be minimal.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: Although low resolution, it could potentially enhance portrait mode shots.

Trade-offs:

  • Moto G (2023): Lack of NFC is a significant drawback for users relying on contactless payments.
  • Nokia G42: Lower refresh rate display may feel less fluid compared to the Moto G (2023).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023): Suitable for users prioritizing a smooth display experience for media consumption, gaming, and general use. Best for budget-conscious buyers who don't require NFC.

Nokia G42: Ideal for users who value NFC for contactless payments and require a device with longer software support. The higher RAM options also make it suitable for users who frequently multitask or use demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is NFC essential for your daily use? If yes, the Nokia G42 is the only option.
  2. How important is display smoothness? If a fluid user experience is a high priority, the Moto G (2023)'s 120Hz display is preferable.
  3. What is your budget and required RAM? The Nokia G42 offers more RAM options at varying price points.

My Choice: Nokia G42

While the Moto G (2023)'s 120Hz display is tempting, the Nokia G42 offers a more well-rounded package. NFC is crucial for me, and the guaranteed Android 14 update ensures longer-term usability. The availability of higher RAM configurations also future-proofs the device for more demanding tasks and longer-term performance. Although the 90Hz display isn't as smooth as 120Hz, it's still a decent refresh rate and acceptable for everyday use. Overall, the Nokia G42 provides better value and longevity for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.