Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 25, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 103.32 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.44 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 189 g 189 g
Height 164 mm 171.4 mm
Width 75 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Ink Blue
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.39 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G (2023)Motorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164 x 75 x 8.4171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is thinner and slightly taller when unfolded, but significantly more compact when folded.
Weight (g)189189Identical weight despite vastly different form factors.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra offers portability and a unique form factor.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr boasts superior color accuracy, contrast, brightness, and smoothness due to AMOLED technology and higher refresh rate. Moto G's LCD is more power efficient but less visually appealing.
Size (inches)6.56.9Razr offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2640Razr's higher resolution results in sharper text and images. Moto G's lower resolution might appear pixelated to some users.
PPI270413Significantly sharper image quality on the Razr.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 480+ 5GSnapdragon 8s Gen 3Razr 50 Ultra offers significantly faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Razr's CPU architecture and clock speeds provide a substantial performance advantage.
RAM (GB)412Razr's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without performance degradation.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)4850While megapixel count is similar, the Razr likely uses a superior sensor and processing, resulting in better image quality. Specific sensor details missing for Moto G.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISRazr offers superior video resolution, frame rates, and stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004000Moto G has a larger battery capacity suggesting longer battery life. However, Razr's LTPO display and more efficient processor could mitigate this difference in real-world usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G (2023) Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life (Potentially): The significantly larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time, especially important for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
  • Lower Price: The Moto G is positioned in the medium price range, making it more affordable.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and 12GB RAM deliver a significantly smoother and faster user experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • High-Quality Display: The foldable AMOLED display offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, high brightness, and a smooth 165Hz refresh rate.
  • Premium Design and Portability: The foldable design allows for a larger screen in a more compact form factor.
  • Advanced Camera Features: The Razr supports higher resolution video recording with advanced features like optical image stabilization and HDR.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G (2023):

  • Budget-conscious users: Prioritize affordability and basic smartphone functionality.
  • Light users: Primarily use their phone for calling, texting, web browsing, and social media.
  • Battery life focused users: Value all-day battery life over high performance or advanced features.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra:

  • Power users: Demand top-tier performance for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
  • Enthusiasts: Value cutting-edge technology, premium design, and a unique form factor.
  • Content creators: Utilize the high-quality camera for photography and videography.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more expensive.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and content creation.
  3. Do you prioritize portability and a unique design? The foldable Razr offers a distinct advantage here.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Moto G (2023) offers excellent value for its price, the Razr 50 Ultra aligns better with my personal preferences. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, a high-quality display, and a compact form factor. The foldable design is intriguing, and the superior performance and camera features are significant advantages. While the battery capacity is smaller, the efficiency gains from the LTPO display and the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 could potentially offset this in real-world usage. The higher price is a premium for these advanced features, but it's a worthwhile investment for me given the significant upgrade in overall user experience and the unique form factor.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.