Alright, let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto G (2022) and the Xiaomi Poco C65. It's always interesting to see how different manufacturers approach the budget smartphone segment, and these two offer some unique takes. Buckle up, tech friends!
Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at how these phones stack up, complete with some practical context:
Feature | Motorola Moto G (2022) | Xiaomi Poco C65 | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 165.4 x 75.8 x 9.4 mm | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm | Poco C65 is taller and wider, Moto G is thicker. Poco C65 might feel more modern, Moto G may feel more bulky |
Weight | 204g | 192g | Poco C65 is lighter, potentially more comfortable for long-term use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.74" | Poco C65 offers a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption. |
Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | Both have similar resolutions, which are fine for everyday usage but not super sharp. |
PPI | 270 | 260 | Both have similar pixel density; sharpness is comparable, but not exceptional. |
Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Standard LCD experience; good for typical viewing but not as vibrant as OLED. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer a smoother visual experience than traditional 60Hz displays, especially when scrolling. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both have identical peak brightness at 0 nits |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Dimensity 700 (Moto G) is more powerful, offering faster performance. |
AnTuTu Score | 389,300 | 237,768 | Moto G's chipset significantly outperforms the Poco C65. This means more responsive apps and smoother gaming. |
GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 | The Moto G’s GPU enables better graphics and smoother gaming experiences than the Poco C65. |
Camera | |||
Standard Camera | 50MP, f/1.8 | 50MP, f/1.8 | Both main cameras are comparable, using the same sensor, performing well in good lighting. |
Selfie Camera | 13MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2 | Moto G has higher resolution for sharper selfies. |
Depth Camera | 2MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | Both are standard depth sensors to improve portrait photos. |
Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | Both are standard macro sensors that are suitable for close-up photography. |
Video | 1080p@30fps; Slow-motion: No, 30 fps | 1080p@30fps; Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps | Both offer 1080p recording; the Poco C65 has better slow-motion capabilities. |
Camera Features | PDAF, HDR, etc. | 4K video, Digital image stabilization, RAW, HDR, etc. | Poco C65 offers 4K video and image stabilization; the Moto G uses PDAF autofocus. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both provide similar battery life, likely lasting a full day for most users. |
Charging | 10W fast charging | 18W fast charging | Poco C65 charges faster, which is more convenient. |
Features | Non-removable | Reverse Charging, Non-removable | Poco C65 has reverse charging; a useful feature for quick top-ups of other devices. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | Poco C65 has a newer version of Android, which may offer a more up-to-date experience. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Both support similar Wi-Fi standards; Poco C65 also offers Dual band |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 | Poco C65 has a newer version of Bluetooth, potentially for better performance. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Poco C65 supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy. |
SIM | Single SIM | Dual SIM | Poco C65 supports dual SIMs, which is great for managing multiple phone numbers. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 64 GB | 128 GB or 256GB | Poco C65 offers significantly more storage, which is essential for media lovers. |
RAM | 6GB | 4/6/8GB | Poco C65 offers up to 8GB RAM, potentially providing better multitasking |
Expandable | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage. |
Security | |||
Features | Side-mounted Fingerprint | Side-mounted Fingerprint | Both have convenient side-mounted fingerprint scanners. |
Build Quality | |||
Protection | Unknown | Unknown | Both phones do not have explicit details about screen protection |
Sensors | |||
Features | Biometric, Proximity, Motion, Environmental | Biometric, Motion, Proximity | The Moto G has a barometer, while the Poco C65 has a virtual proximity sensor, meaning more sensors on the Moto G. |
Key Insights
Motorola Moto G (2022)
Strengths:
- Performance Prowess: The Dimensity 700 chipset offers superior performance compared to the Helio G85, resulting in faster apps and a more seamless gaming experience.
- Selfie Camera Advantage: The 13MP front-facing camera provides more detailed selfies than the Poco C65's 8MP sensor.
- Environmental Sensor: The Moto G includes a Barometer which the Poco C65 doesn't have, this could be a vital sensor for specific use cases
Trade-offs:
- Older OS: Ships with Android 12, potentially missing out on the latest features and updates.
- Slower Charging: 10W charging is significantly slower than the 18W charging of the Poco C65.
- Less Storage 64GB base storage is very limited for modern smartphones
Xiaomi Poco C65
Strengths:
- More Storage: A base storage of 128GB (or 256GB) is a huge advantage for storing more photos, videos, and apps.
- Faster Charging: 18W fast charging is significantly quicker, reducing downtime and enabling users to stay connected.
- Dual SIM Support: The ability to use two SIM cards simultaneously is great for users with multiple lines.
- Newer OS: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, potentially offering a more up-to-date and future-proof experience.
- Better Video Recording Features: Offers 4K video recording as well as stabilization
- **Reverse Charging:** The ability to charge other devices through your smartphone
Trade-offs:
- Less powerful chipset: Slower processing times compared to the Moto G
- Lower resolution selfie camera: Lower quality selfies
User Profiles and Recommendations
Motorola Moto G (2022)
- Performance-focused users: Gamers and those who prioritize speed and responsiveness will find this phone more suitable.
- Budget conscious: If you're seeking the absolute best performance for your money, this is likely to be better, despite it's older status.
- Users who don't need too much storage: If you mostly stream content, then the 64GB of storage might be enough.
Xiaomi Poco C65
- Media consumers: Those who watch a lot of videos, play music, and take many photos will appreciate the larger storage and faster charging capabilities.
- Multitaskers: The option of a higher memory configuration will help with multiple applications open at the same time.
- Users who need two SIMs: Ideal for people who travel or need a work and personal number on the same device.
- Users who would prefer the most modern experience: The newer OS and features are attractive to those who want the latest technologies.
Buying Decision Framework
Here are three critical questions to consider when choosing between these two phones:
- How much do I prioritize performance and speed? If you're a gamer or someone who values smooth multitasking, the Moto G's chipset is better suited.
- How important is storage space and fast charging for me? For users who need ample space and want quick top-ups, the Poco C65 is the better pick.
- Do I need two SIM cards, and is a newer operating system important to me? The Poco C65 offers dual SIM support and a newer version of Android than the Moto G
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- The Power User: If you are looking for the best performance for the money, go with the Moto G (2022).
- The Media Lover: Choose the Poco C65; it is a great device for consumption and quick charging.
- The Dual SIM User: The only choice here is the Poco C65.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two, I'd lean towards the Xiaomi Poco C65. While the Moto G has better performance on paper, the Poco C65's combination of faster charging, higher base storage, and more modern operating system would better serve my needs as well as offer a better experience. I regularly need to download and access large files, plus having a faster charging option is almost a must for my busy schedule. The newer Android 13 OS is also a plus in terms of future-proofing and features.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to what's most important to you, the user. Both devices are excellent choices in the budget category, each offering a unique value proposition.