Alright, let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto G (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. It's always fascinating to see how different manufacturers approach similar price points, and these two phones offer some interesting trade-offs.
1. Specifications Breakdown
Here's a detailed look at how these two phones stack up, focusing on the practical implications for you, the user:
Feature | Motorola Moto G (2022) | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 165.4 × 75.8 × 9.4 mm | 162.1 × 77.6 × 8.3 mm | Moto G (2022) is taller and thicker, feels more substantial. A24 4G is slightly wider but thinner, may be easier to handle for some. |
Weight | 204g | 195g | A24 4G is slightly lighter, might be more comfortable during extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.5" | Both phones offer the same 6.5-inch screen size, providing a similar viewing area for content consumption. |
Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2340 | A24 4G has a significantly sharper display. Expect crisper text, clearer images, and overall better visual fidelity. |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 270 | 396 | A24 4G’s higher PPI means noticeably less pixelation and a more refined visual experience. |
Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | A24 4G with AMOLED has superior blacks, contrast, better colors, and is more energy efficient for dark themes, leading to richer, more vibrant visuals. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animation, making general use feel more fluid. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 1000 nits | A24 4G has substantially better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight, making it much more usable in challenging lighting conditions. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Helio G99 in A24 4G offers marginally better overall performance. Both are capable for everyday tasks but the G99 might have a slight edge in intensive applications. |
AnTuTu Score | 389,300 | 411,900 | A24 4G has slightly higher benchmark scores, indicating a small real-world performance advantage. |
GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Both phones use the same GPU. Performance should be similar in graphical tasks, but may differ due to different chipset configurations. |
Camera | |||
Standard Camera | 50MP f/1.8 | 50MP f/1.8 | Both phones offer similar resolution, though sensor differences may lead to differences in image quality, especially in low light. |
Selfie Camera | 13MP f/2.2 | 13MP f/2.2 | Front-facing camera performance should be comparable, though results may vary in different lighting conditions. |
Wide Angle Lens | None | 5MP f/2.2 | A24 4G offers a wide-angle lens, allowing for more versatile photography, capturing more in a single frame. |
Portrait Mode (Depth) | 2MP f/2.4 | None | Moto G (2022) has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos. Results may not be significant over software-based solutions. |
Macro Lens | 2MP f/2.4 | 2MP f/2.4 | Both phones offer similar quality macro lenses. Good for close up shots. |
Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (with EIS) | A24 4G has electronic image stabilization which results in smoother video recordings. |
Slow-motion Video | No | Yes (120 fps) | A24 4G has slow motion video capability, opening up some creative video shooting opportunities. |
Camera Features | PDAF, HDR, etc | PDAF, OIS, Panorama, etc | A24 4G offers OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) and Panorama, leading to more stable photos and more versatile shots. |
Battery Life | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones have similar battery capacity, meaning similar battery life. |
Charging | 10W fast charging | 25W fast charging | A24 4G charges faster, meaning significantly reduced charging times. |
Battery Type | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer | A24 4G’s Li-Polymer batteries tend to have slightly better longevity. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | A24 4G ships with a newer version of Android, ensuring access to the latest features and updates for longer. |
Max OS Upgrade | No Info | Android 17 | A24 4G is confirmed to have upgrades to Android 17, meaning more software updates and feature enhancements. |
Connectivity | |||
Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Both have the same Wi-Fi capabilities, enabling fast and stable wireless internet connectivity. |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 | A24 4G has a newer Bluetooth version, which leads to increased speeds, stability, and better power efficiency. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A24 4G has more options for satellite connection leading to more accurate GPS positioning. |
SIM | Single SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | A24 4G offers the option to use two SIM cards simultaneously which is very useful for those with multiple numbers. |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB | A24 4G offers double the storage space, which is crucial for storing more media files and applications. |
RAM | 6 GB | 4/6/8 GB | A24 4G offers options for more RAM with an 8 GB option which is better for more intense applications and multitasking. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone has any option for expandable storage which could be limiting for some users. |
Audio | |||
Audio Quality | Basic | Basic | Both phones offer similar audio performance. |
Security | |||
Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Side-mounted | Both have side-mounted fingerprint sensors, offering similar ease of use and basic security. |
Sensors | |||
Suite | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor | Motorola Moto G includes a Barometer, while the Samsung A24 has a geomagnetic sensor. |
2. Key Insights
Motorola Moto G (2022):
- Strengths: Decent performance for the price, a fairly capable main camera, a depth sensor for portrait shots, and a slightly more comprehensive suite of sensors including a barometer.
- Competitive Advantages: The main advantage here is its slightly more comprehensive sensor suite with a barometer, which can be useful for those who need environmental data. The Moto G also offers a great suite of Bluetooth protocols.
- Trade-offs/Limitations: Lower screen resolution, an LCD panel, a slower charging speed, lacks OIS and a wide-angle lens. Additionally, it's running a slightly older version of Android and has no option for expandable storage.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G:
- Strengths: Superior display (AMOLED, higher resolution, higher brightness), better camera system with OIS and a wide-angle lens, faster charging, better processor, updated software, and more storage.
- Competitive Advantages: A more modern, vibrant display; a more versatile camera setup; and overall better performance and user experience.
- Trade-offs/Limitations: Lacks a dedicated depth sensor for portrait shots and the Bluetooth protocol suite is not as large.
3. User Profiles and Recommendations
Motorola Moto G (2022) is best for:
- Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and sensor suite over display and camera quality.
- Users who need a secondary or backup device where a wide range of bluetooth functionality is beneficial.
- Users who need the additional environmental data that is provided by the barometer.
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is best for:
- Users who value a high-quality display for media consumption and general use.
- Casual photographers and social media enthusiasts who want a versatile camera.
- Users who are looking for the best overall experience for this price bracket, needing fast charging and plenty of internal storage.
4. Buying Decision Framework
Here are three questions to help you decide between these phones:
- How much do you value display quality? If a sharp, vibrant screen is a priority, the A24 4G is the clear winner.
- Are camera features important to you? The A24 4G's wide-angle lens, OIS, and slow-motion capabilities make it much more versatile.
- What is your budget and what features are most important to you? If you are on a tight budget, the Motorola Moto G 2022 may be for you, but if you have some extra wiggle room, the Samsung A24 4G will be the clear choice.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- For the casual user: The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is the better choice, offering a more polished experience with its superior display and camera.
- For the budget-conscious: The Motorola Moto G (2022) is adequate, but keep in mind the trade-offs in screen quality and camera features.
- For the photography enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G's OIS and wide-angle lens make it a more versatile and capable camera phone.
- For the media enthusiast: The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G's AMOLED display is the clear winner with higher resolution, contrast, and brightness.
My Pick
If I were choosing between these two, I would absolutely go for the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G. The advantages it offers in terms of display quality, camera versatility, faster charging, and overall performance are significant and make it a far more compelling device. The AMOLED screen alone makes a world of difference in everyday usage, and the inclusion of OIS is extremely valuable for photo and video capture. While the Motorola Moto G (2022) has its own benefits, the overall user experience offered by the A24 4G is simply superior for the majority of people. Yes, it comes at a slightly higher price point, but I believe the value it brings is well worth the investment. The A24 4G's combination of features addresses the key needs of a typical smartphone user, providing a more immersive and enjoyable experience all around.