Motorola Moto E22 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 169 g 189 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto E22 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Practical Comparison

Let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto E22 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G, cutting through the technical jargon to understand what these specs truly mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6A75 slightly larger, may feel less pocketable.
Weight (g)169189E22 noticeably lighter, more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical sharpness; both are HD+, acceptable for general use but not pin-sharp.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles, but lower contrast than OLED.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37Unisoc T606T606 generally offers better CPU performance, especially in multi-core tasks.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreBoth offer decent performance for everyday tasks, but T606's architecture is more modern.
RAM (GB)3/44/8A75 offers more RAM, leading to better multitasking and app switching.
Storage32/64/128 GB128/256 GBA75 offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, and videos
Camera
Rear Main (MP)1650A75 boasts significantly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail.
Front (MP)58A75 likely to produce better selfies.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)40205000A75 has a much larger battery, promising significantly longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The ZTE Blade A75 4G, with its Unisoc T606 processor and higher RAM options, pulls ahead in performance, especially for demanding tasks and multitasking. The Moto E22 is sufficient for basic use, but may struggle with heavier workloads.
  • Camera: The 50MP main camera on the A75 offers a clear advantage in resolution over the E22's 16MP sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, this difference likely translates to more detailed photos, especially in good lighting. The A75 also boasts a higher resolution front-facing camera.
  • Battery: The A75's massive 5000mAh battery significantly outlasts the E22's 4020mAh battery. Expect a full day of heavy use from the A75, while the E22 will likely require a top-up.
  • Price: The Moto E22 positions itself in the medium price range, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G aims for the lower end. Considering the A75's superior specs, it offers compelling value.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Best suited for light users who prioritize a lightweight phone for basic communication, social media, and web browsing. Its affordability makes it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Ideal for users who demand more performance, longer battery life, and a better camera. Gamers, multimedia consumers, and those who heavily multitask will appreciate the A75's capabilities. Its ample storage also caters to users who store a lot of media.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? If price is your primary concern, the E22 is the more affordable option.
  • How demanding are your usage patterns? For heavy multitasking, gaming, or media consumption, the A75 is a better fit.
  • How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is crucial, the A75's larger battery is a significant advantage.

My Choice: I would choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While the Moto E22 offers a lighter design, the A75's superior performance, significantly longer battery life, larger storage options, and better camera system make it the more compelling device overall, especially considering its competitive price point. The performance and battery life gains are significant enough to outweigh the slight increase in size and weight for me. I value a phone that can keep up with my workflow and last a full day without needing a recharge. The A75 delivers on those fronts, making it the clear winner in my book.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.