Motorola Moto E22 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g N/A
Weight 169 g 0 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.7 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto E22 vs. Tecno Spark Go 2024: A Practical Comparison

Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Tecno Spark Go 2024, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Tecno Spark Go 2024Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6Spark Go is slightly larger and thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Weight (g)1690Missing data for Spark Go. Moto E22 is lightweight.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Spark Go offers marginally larger screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical sharpness. Neither offers Full HD, expect some pixelation in fine details.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate. Expect decent color reproduction but limited viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37Unisoc T606T606 generally benchmarks slightly higher in CPU performance; real-world difference may be subtle.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Spark Go has a more modern CPU architecture; potential advantage in demanding tasks and power efficiency.
RAM3/4GB3/4GBBoth offer configurations suitable for light multitasking; 4GB variant recommended for smoother performance.
Camera
Rear Camera16MP + 2MP13MP+ QVGAMoto E22 likely offers better overall image quality with its higher resolution primary sensor.
Selfie Camera5MP8MPSpark Go boasts a higher resolution front camera for potentially better selfies.
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhSpark Go has a significantly larger battery, promising longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: While the Helio G37 in the Moto E22 is no slouch, the Unisoc T606 in the Spark Go 2024, with its more modern CPU architecture, is likely to offer a performance edge, particularly in demanding tasks and multitasking. However, for everyday use like browsing, social media, and light gaming, the difference might be negligible.
  • Display: Both phones feature nearly identical displays in terms of size and resolution. The 90Hz refresh rate on both ensures a smooth user experience. Don't expect flagship-level vibrancy or brightness, but they should be adequate for everyday use.
  • Camera: The Moto E22's 16MP primary camera might offer slightly better image quality compared to the Spark Go 2024's 13MP sensor. However, the Spark Go's 8MP selfie camera could be an advantage for selfie enthusiasts.
  • Battery: The Spark Go 2024's massive 5000mAh battery is a clear winner here. Expect significantly longer usage on a single charge compared to the Moto E22's 4020mAh battery.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Suitable for users prioritizing a compact and lightweight phone with decent performance and a reliable camera for everyday use. Its NFC capability is a bonus for contactless payments. Budget-conscious users who don't heavily rely on their phones for extended periods will find this a good fit.
  • Tecno Spark Go 2024: Ideal for users who prioritize long battery life and a slightly larger screen. Students, casual gamers, or anyone who consumes a lot of media on their phone will appreciate the extended usage time.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. How important is battery life to you? If all-day battery life is a must-have, the Spark Go 2024 is the clear winner.
  2. What is your budget? Both phones are in the medium price range, but slight price differences might exist depending on the region and storage variant. Consider the price-to-value ratio based on your needs.
  3. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? The Moto E22 offers NFC, while the Spark Go 2024 does not.

My Choice: I would choose the Tecno Spark Go 2024. While the Moto E22 offers NFC, which I use frequently, the significantly larger battery in the Spark Go 2024 is a compelling factor for me. I prioritize all-day battery life and the peace of mind that comes with not constantly worrying about charging. The slight performance advantage and the larger screen are added bonuses. I am willing to make a slight compromise on camera quality for the substantial gain in battery capacity. Furthermore, the potential price difference would likely be minimal.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.