Motorola Moto E22 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 169 g 222 g
Height 163.6 mm 162.3 mm
Width 74.7 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto E22 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto E22 and the Samsung Galaxy M35, translating their specs into real-world experiences to help you decide which phone fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1M35 slightly wider, thicker, and heavier. Moto E22 potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)169222Moto E22 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2340M35 significantly sharper and more detailed visuals; noticeable difference in clarity.
Panel TypeIPS LCD, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzM35 offers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling thanks to AMOLED and 120Hz.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37 (12nm)Exynos 1380 (5nm)M35 vastly more powerful; expect significantly faster performance and smoother multitasking.
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 2.4 GHzM35's more modern CPU architecture and higher clock speed deliver superior performance.
RAM (GB)3/46/8M35 offers more RAM for seamless multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 12Android 14M35 comes with a newer OS version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1650M35 boasts a higher resolution sensor, potentially capturing more detail and light.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsM35 capable of recording much higher resolution video.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)40206000M35 boasts significantly larger battery capacity, promising much longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Disparity: The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy M35 blows the Helio G37 in the Moto E22 out of the water. The M35 will handle demanding games, multitasking, and intensive apps with far greater ease. The Moto E22 is designed for basic tasks and lighter usage.
  • Display Quality: The M35's Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a noticeably superior visual experience compared to the E22's 90Hz IPS LCD. Expect richer colors, deeper blacks, smoother scrolling, and overall greater visual clarity on the M35.
  • Battery Endurance: The Galaxy M35's massive 6000mAh battery should easily last a full day even with heavy use, while the Moto E22's 4020mAh battery will likely require more frequent charging.
  • Camera Capabilities: The 50MP main camera on the M35, coupled with its ability to record 4K video, offers significant advantages over the E22's 16MP camera and 1080p video recording.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, social media) and light web browsing. Students or seniors seeking a simple, affordable device would find it suitable.
  • Samsung Galaxy M35: Ideal for users who demand strong performance for gaming, multimedia consumption, multitasking, and photography. Content creators, mobile photographers, or anyone seeking a future-proof device would appreciate the M35's capabilities.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E22 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Light usage vs. demanding tasks?
  3. How important is long battery life? The M35 offers exceptional endurance.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Moto E22
  • Performance and Feature Focused: Samsung Galaxy M35

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Moto E22 offers excellent value for its price, I prioritize performance, a high-quality display, long battery life, and a capable camera. The M35 excels in all these areas, offering a significantly more compelling overall package. The investment in the M35 is justified by its future-proof specifications, ensuring a smooth and enjoyable user experience for years to come. The superior AMOLED display and vastly improved camera are major selling points for me. Even though the M35 is heavier, the trade-off is worth it for the enhanced performance and features.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.