Motorola Moto E22 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 169 g 195 g
Height 163.6 mm 162.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, dissecting their specs and revealing what they truly offer in the real world.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Samsung Galaxy A24 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3A24 slightly shorter and wider, both relatively thin. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)169195E22 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzSuper AMOLED, 90HzA24's AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340A24 significantly sharper and more detailed; noticeable difference in text clarity and image quality.
Size6.5"6.5"Identical screen sizes.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37 (12nm)Helio G99 (6nm)A24 boasts a more powerful and efficient processor, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 2.2 GHzA24 has a slightly faster CPU architecture, providing a performance edge.
RAM3/4GB6/8GBA24 offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and app performance.
OSAndroid 12Android 13A24 comes with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Main Camera16MP50MPA24's higher resolution main camera captures significantly more detail.
FeaturesBasicOIS, wider lensA24 offers optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos, plus a wider lens.
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhA24 packs a considerably larger battery, promising significantly longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G emerges as the clear winner in terms of overall performance, display quality, and camera capabilities. Its AMOLED display, more powerful processor, larger RAM, and higher-resolution camera with OIS provide a superior user experience. The Moto E22's key advantages lie in its lighter weight and lower price point. However, the performance and display discrepancies are significant.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage. Ideal for users who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and browsing social media. Its lighter weight is a plus for extended single-hand use.
  • Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Ideal for users seeking a well-rounded smartphone experience with a vibrant display, smooth performance, and capable camera. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? If price is the primary concern, the Moto E22 is the more affordable option.
  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the E22 suffices. For demanding applications and media consumption, the A24 is necessary.
  • How important is display quality and camera performance? The A24 significantly outperforms the E22 in these areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

While the Moto E22 offers an attractive entry-level price, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G represents a significantly better value proposition for a slightly higher investment. The superior display, performance, battery life, and camera quality contribute to a more enjoyable and versatile smartphone experience. The difference in RAM alone (6GB vs. 3/4GB) future-proofs the A24 and promises a smooth user experience for longer. As someone who appreciates responsive performance and vibrant visuals, the A24 aligns more closely with my personal preferences and usage patterns. While weight is a factor, the advantages of the A24 significantly outweigh the minor difference in heft.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.