Motorola Moto E22 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 169 g 188 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Samsung Galaxy A04e, two budget-friendly smartphones vying for your attention. We'll dissect their specs, translate them into real-world implications, and help you decide which phone best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Samsung Galaxy A04eReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1Moto E22 is slightly thinner and lighter. A04e's extra thickness might provide a more robust feel.
Weight (g)169188Moto E22 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and portability.
Display
Size6.5"6.5"Identical screen sizes offer similar media consumption experiences.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1600Both have HD+ resolution, acceptable for the price range but not as sharp as higher-resolution displays.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzPLS LCDMoto E22's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, a noticeable advantage.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37Helio P35Both offer entry-level performance; G37 may have a slight edge in gaming due to higher clock speeds.
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 2.3 GHzSimilar CPU configurations indicate comparable everyday performance.
RAM3/4GB3/4GBRAM options are equal, impacting multitasking capabilities. More RAM is generally better.
Camera
Rear Camera16MP + 2MP13MP + 2MPMoto E22 boasts a slightly higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail.
Selfie Camera5MP5MPSelfie camera resolution is identical.
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhGalaxy A04e has a significantly larger battery, likely translating to longer usage time.
Other
NFCYesNoMoto E22 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Price RangeMediumLowMoto E22 is positioned slightly higher in price.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Moto E22's 90Hz refresh rate is a significant differentiator, making interactions feel noticeably smoother. While both displays have the same resolution, the faster refresh rate on the E22 provides a more fluid user experience.
  • Performance: While both chipsets are entry-level, the Helio G37 in the Moto E22 may offer a marginal performance advantage. Real-world differences might be subtle for everyday tasks but could be noticeable in gaming.
  • Battery: The Galaxy A04e's massive 5000 mAh battery is a clear winner for endurance. This translates to significantly longer usage time between charges, a crucial factor for many users.
  • NFC: The inclusion of NFC in the Moto E22 allows for contactless payments and other NFC-based interactions, a feature absent in the A04e.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Best suited for users who prioritize a smooth display experience and value features like NFC for mobile payments. Gamers on a tight budget might also find the E22's slightly better performance appealing.
  • Samsung Galaxy A04e: Ideal for users who prioritize long battery life above all else. Its lower price point makes it an attractive option for budget-conscious individuals who primarily use their phones for basic tasks.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is paramount, the Galaxy A04e is the clear choice.
  2. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? If so, the Moto E22 is your only option here.
  3. How much do you value a smooth display? The Moto E22's 90Hz refresh rate offers a tangible improvement in user experience.

My Choice: Motorola Moto E22

While the Galaxy A04e's battery life is tempting, I would choose the Motorola Moto E22. The 90Hz display significantly enhances daily interactions, making the phone feel more responsive and modern. NFC is essential for me for mobile payments and other convenient functionalities. The slightly higher price is a worthwhile trade-off for these features, especially considering the potential performance benefits of the Helio G37. As someone who values a fluid user experience and modern conveniences, the Moto E22 better aligns with my needs. The A04e is a great value pick for battery life champions, but the E22 offers a more well-rounded package.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.