Motorola Moto E22 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 169 g 182 g
Height 163.6 mm 162.4 mm
Width 74.7 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Oppo Reno11, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Oppo Reno11Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9Reno11 slightly more compact
Weight (g)169182E22 noticeably lighter
Build MaterialsPlasticGlass, Aluminum FrameReno11 more premium feel, potentially more durable
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Reno11: Vibrant colors, deeper blacks, smoother scrolling
Size6.5"6.7"Reno11: Larger screen real estate
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2412Reno11: Sharper, more detailed visuals
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37 (12nm)Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Reno11: Significantly faster processing, better efficiency
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 2.6 GHzReno11: More responsive performance, smoother multitasking
RAM3/4GB8/12GBReno11: Much better for demanding apps and multitasking
Storage32/64/128GB256/512GBReno11: Ample storage for apps, media, and files
Camera
Rear Camera16MP + 2MP50MP + 8MP + 32MPReno11: Superior image quality, versatility with telephoto and ultrawide
Front Camera5MP32MPReno11: Much better selfie camera
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@120fpsReno11: Higher resolution video recording, slow-motion capabilities
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhReno11: Longer battery life

2. Key Insights

The Moto E22 is a budget-friendly phone focused on essential functionality. Its strengths lie in its lightweight design and affordability. However, its performance and camera capabilities are basic.

The Oppo Reno11 is a mid-range device offering a significant step up in performance, display quality, and camera technology. The AMOLED display, powerful processor, and versatile camera system cater to a more demanding user.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto E22: Ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and light app usage. Not recommended for gamers, photographers, or heavy multitaskers.

Oppo Reno11: Suitable for users who value a premium experience with a vibrant display, smooth performance, excellent camera capabilities, and long battery life. A good choice for content consumption, mobile gaming, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Moto E22 is significantly cheaper.
  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic use, the E22 suffices; for demanding tasks, the Reno11 is necessary.
  • How important are display quality, camera performance, and overall speed? The Reno11 excels in these areas.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Reno11. While the Moto E22 offers excellent value for its price, I prioritize a smooth, responsive user experience with a high-quality display and a capable camera. The Reno11's superior performance, vibrant AMOLED screen, versatile camera system, and larger battery capacity align better with my needs and usage patterns. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in overall quality and capabilities. As someone who appreciates the nuances of technology, the Reno11's advanced features and future-proof 5G connectivity make it a more compelling choice for the long term.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.