Motorola Moto E22 vs Nokia C22 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C22
Nokia C22
Nokia

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 February 25, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 107.44 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 169 g 190 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.6 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Midnight Black
  • Sand

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 46.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto E22 vs. Nokia C22: A Practical Comparison

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, with manufacturers vying to offer the best value for your money. Today, we'll dissect two contenders: the Motorola Moto E22 and the Nokia C22. We'll delve beyond the spec sheets to uncover what these phones offer in real-world usage, helping you decide which one best fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Nokia C22Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6Moto E22 is slightly smaller and thinner
Weight (g)169190Moto E22 feels noticeably lighter in hand
Fingerprint SensorSide-mountedRear-mountedPersonal preference, side often more accessible
Display
Size6.5"6.5"Same screen real estate
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution, decent sharpness for the size
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCDMoto E22's 90Hz offers smoother scrolling and animations
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37 (12nm)Unisoc SC9863A (28nm)Moto E22's chipset is newer and more efficient
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 1.6 GHzMoto E22 should deliver better performance
RAM3/4GB2/3GBMoto E22 offers more RAM for multitasking
OSAndroid 12Android 13 (Go Edition)Nokia C22 has a newer OS designed for efficiency on low end devices
Camera
Rear Camera16MP + 2MP13MP + 2MPMoto E22 has a slightly higher resolution main sensor
Front Camera5MP8MPNokia C22 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera
Battery Life
Capacity4020 mAh5000 mAhNokia C22 offers significantly larger battery capacity
Other
NFCYesNoMoto E22 supports contactless payments and data transfer
PriceMediumLowNokia C22 is generally more affordable

2. Key Insights

Moto E22 Strengths: Smoother 90Hz display, more powerful processor, NFC functionality. The higher refresh rate display significantly enhances daily interactions, making scrolling and animations feel more fluid. The Helio G37 provides a noticeable performance advantage for everyday tasks and light gaming.

Nokia C22 Strengths: Significantly larger battery, potentially longer lifespan due to cleaner Android Go OS and a newer Android version. The 5000 mAh battery can easily last a full day or even two on moderate usage. Although its raw specs might not be the most powerful, this allows for a lighter load on the hardware, resulting in less battery drain from processes running in the background.

Trade-offs: The Moto E22 prioritizes performance and modern features like NFC at the expense of battery capacity. The Nokia C22 focuses on long-lasting battery life and affordability, but compromises on performance and features.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto E22: Suited for users who prioritize a smooth display experience, moderate gaming, and NFC functionality. Ideal for social media enthusiasts, casual gamers, and those who frequently use contactless payments.

Nokia C22: Best for users who value exceptional battery life above all else. Perfect for those who need a reliable communication device with minimal downtime for charging. A great option for older users or those less concerned with demanding applications and more focused on simple functionality and battery endurance.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. How important is battery life to you? If all-day battery is crucial, the Nokia C22 is the clear winner.
  2. Do you value a smooth display and better performance for everyday tasks? If so, the Moto E22 offers a more responsive and enjoyable user experience.
  3. Do you need NFC for contactless payments? This feature is only available on the Moto E22.

My Choice: As Alex Griffin, I would choose the Moto E22. While the Nokia C22's massive battery is tempting, I prioritize a fluid user experience and the convenience of NFC. The Moto E22's 90Hz display and more powerful processor would make everyday tasks and light gaming more enjoyable. I'm willing to carry a power bank to compensate for the smaller battery to gain the benefits of a smoother display and better performance. The inclusion of NFC for mobile payments and other functionalities further solidifies my choice. For my usage patterns, the Moto E22 strikes a better balance between features, performance, and practicality.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.