Motorola Moto E22 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 169 g 184.5 g
Height 163.6 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.7 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, two phones occupying distinct segments of the market.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Motorola Razr 40 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8170.8 x 74 x 7Razr 40 Ultra is significantly thinner and slightly taller when unfolded. Its foldable design offers portability but may compromise durability. E22 is more robust.
Weight (g)169184.5E22 is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. Razr 40 Ultra's weight is reasonable for a foldable.
FoldableNoYesRazr 40 Ultra's foldable screen allows for a larger display in a pocketable size. E22 offers a traditional smartphone form factor.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 165HzRazr 40 Ultra boasts superior color accuracy, contrast, and smoothness with its AMOLED display and higher refresh rate. E22's display is basic but functional.
Size (inches)6.56.9Razr 40 Ultra offers a larger screen for immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2640Razr 40 Ultra has a sharper, more detailed display.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Razr 40 Ultra provides significantly faster processing power and smoother multitasking. E22 is suitable for basic tasks.
RAM (GB)3/48/12Razr 40 Ultra offers more memory for demanding applications and seamless multitasking.
OSAndroid 12Android 13Razr 40 Ultra runs a newer version of Android with potential software updates for a longer period.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1612While Razr has fewer megapixels, its sensor and processing likely result in superior image quality. E22's camera is basic.
Selfie Camera (MP)532Razr 40 Ultra has a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)40203800E22 has a slightly larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on usage patterns and software optimization. Razr 40 Ultra's battery life might be impacted by the power demands of its large, high refresh rate display and powerful processor.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Razr 40 Ultra dramatically outperforms the Moto E22 thanks to its flagship Snapdragon processor and ample RAM. The E22 is designed for basic tasks, while the Razr 40 Ultra can handle demanding applications and gaming.
  • Display: The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable AMOLED display with a 165Hz refresh rate offers a premium visual experience compared to the E22's standard LCD. The folding capability is a significant differentiator, allowing for a large screen in a compact form.
  • Camera: While megapixel count isn't everything, the Razr 40 Ultra likely produces superior image quality due to its advanced sensor technology and image processing. The E22's camera system is functional but unremarkable.
  • Price: The Razr 40 Ultra is a premium, flagship-level device with a price tag reflecting its advanced features. The Moto E22 is a budget-friendly option for users prioritizing affordability.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Students, seniors, or anyone seeking a simple, affordable phone would find the E22 suitable.
  • Razr 40 Ultra: Designed for tech-savvy users who value cutting-edge technology, a premium display, top-tier performance, and a unique foldable design. Content creators, multitaskers, and those seeking a statement device would be drawn to the Razr 40 Ultra.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The E22 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Razr 40 Ultra is essential.
  3. Do you value portability and a large screen? The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design addresses this need uniquely.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. While the Moto E22 offers excellent value for its price, I prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and innovative design. The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable form factor, powerful Snapdragon processor, stunning AMOLED screen, and advanced camera system align with my preferences for a device that can handle demanding tasks, provide a premium multimedia experience, and offer a glimpse into the future of mobile technology. The higher price is justified for the significant leap in capabilities and the unique user experience it offers.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.