Motorola Moto E22 vs Cubot KingKong X - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date October 11, 2022 July 23, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 97.77 cm³ 262.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.85 "/g 1.7 "/g
Weight 169 g 388 g
Height 163.6 mm 170.9 mm
Width 74.7 mm 82.2 mm
Thickness 8 mm 18.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.58 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.5 % 74.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 95.15 mAh/in² 235.59 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.12 mAh/cm³ 38.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4020 mAh 10200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Cubot KingKong X, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto E22Cubot KingKong XReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.6 x 74.7 x 8170.9 x 82.2 x 18.7KingKong X significantly larger and heavier, emphasizing ruggedness over pocketability. Moto E22 sleeker and lighter.
Weight (g)169388KingKong X built for durability, potentially less comfortable for extended use. Moto E22 easier to handle.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.58Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2408KingKong X boasts sharper visuals and more screen detail due to higher resolution. Moto E22 adequate for basic tasks.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120KingKong X offers smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the visual experience.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer good color reproduction and viewing angles, but lack the deep blacks of OLED.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G37Dimensity 7050KingKong X significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking and demanding gaming. Moto E22 for basic use.
CPUOcta-core 2.3 GHzOcta-core 2.6 GHzKingKong X offers superior processing power for demanding applications.
RAM (GB)3/416Massive RAM advantage for KingKong X, enabling seamless multitasking and app switching. Moto E22 can experience limitations.
Storage (GB)32/64/128256/512KingKong X offers ample storage for media and apps. Moto E22 more limited, may require external storage.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)16100KingKong X boasts a much higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail. Real-world performance depends on sensor and processing.
Selfie Camera (MP)532KingKong X offers a significantly better selfie camera for sharper and more detailed self-portraits.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)402010200KingKong X has a massively larger battery, promising significantly longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Cubot KingKong X dramatically outperforms the Moto E22 with its powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset and a substantial 16GB of RAM. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for demanding tasks and gaming. The Moto E22 is geared towards basic usage.
  • Display: While both phones feature IPS LCD screens, the KingKong X offers a higher resolution and a faster 120Hz refresh rate, resulting in sharper visuals and smoother animations.
  • Camera: The KingKong X boasts a significantly higher resolution main camera (100MP vs. 16MP) and a much improved selfie camera (32MP vs. 5MP). However, megapixels don't tell the whole story; image quality depends heavily on sensor quality and image processing.
  • Battery: The KingKong X's colossal 10200mAh battery dwarfs the Moto E22's 4020mAh battery, promising exceptionally long battery life.
  • Ruggedness: While not explicitly detailed in the specs, the "KingKong" moniker suggests the Cubot device is built for durability, likely featuring water and dust resistance. The Moto E22 offers a more standard design.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto E22: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption. Ideal for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary device.
  • Cubot KingKong X: A compelling option for power users, gamers, and those who demand long battery life. Its rugged design might also appeal to outdoor enthusiasts.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E22 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What is your primary use case? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important is battery life? The KingKong X offers exceptional longevity.

My Choice

I would choose the Cubot KingKong X. While significantly larger and heavier, the performance advantages, superior display, massive battery, and potential ruggedness make it a more compelling device for my needs. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, and the KingKong X's powerful hardware and ample RAM deliver on that front. The substantial battery life also aligns with my lifestyle. While the Moto E22 is a solid budget option, the KingKong X offers a more future-proof and versatile experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.