Motorola Moto E13 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 189 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Virtually identical in size and feel.
Weight (g)179.5189A75 slightly heavier, but unlikely to be noticeable in daily use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Both low-resolution; expect some pixelation. Minimal practical difference.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90A75's 90Hz refresh rate will provide smoother scrolling and animations compared to the E13's likely 60Hz.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Identical chipsets; expect similar performance in basic tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Same CPU configuration; performance differences will likely depend on RAM and software optimization.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MP1Same GPU; expect similar gaming performance, likely limited to casual games.
RAM2GB/4GB4GB/8GBA75 offers more RAM options; 8GB significantly improves multitasking and reduces app closures.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP + 0.3MP(depth)A75 boasts higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. The depth sensor on the A75 may slightly improve portrait mode.
Front Camera5MP8MPA75's higher resolution front camera should deliver better selfie quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities; expected similar battery life, influenced by software optimization and usage patterns.
Fast Charging10W22.5WA75 charges significantly faster.
Other
NFCNoYesA75 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run on Android 13; differences may arise from custom UI implementations and bloatware.
Fingerprint SensorNoYes (side-mounted)A75 offers a fingerprint sensor for enhanced security and convenience.
Storage OptionsUp to 128GBUp to 256GBA75 offers more internal storage, crucial for media consumption and app installations.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Potentially cheaper (depending on specific configuration).

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother user experience.
  • More RAM: Better multitasking and app performance.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially better image quality.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly less downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Fingerprint Sensor: Added security and convenience.
  • More Storage: Accommodates more apps and media.

Trade-offs:

  • The ZTE Blade A75 4G, while offering superior specifications, likely comes at a higher price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users primarily needing basic communication (calls, texts, light web browsing).
  • Use Cases: Simple tasks, infrequent app usage, limited media consumption.

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a more well-rounded experience with smoother performance, better camera, and modern features like NFC and fingerprint sensor.
  • Use Cases: Moderate multitasking, casual gaming, media consumption, mobile photography, contactless payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The E13 prioritizes affordability, while the A75 offers better value for a slightly higher price.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. multimedia consumption, gaming, and multitasking.
  3. Which features are essential to you? NFC, fingerprint sensor, faster charging, smoother display.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Needs: Motorola Moto E13
  • Balanced Performance and Features: ZTE Blade A75 4G

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

While the Motorola Moto E13 offers a barebones, budget-friendly option, the ZTE Blade A75 4G provides a significantly better overall user experience for a reasonable price increase. The 90Hz display, increased RAM, better camera, faster charging, NFC, fingerprint sensor, and more storage are valuable additions that enhance daily usability. The A75's advantages outweigh its slightly higher price, making it a better long-term investment for most users beyond those with the strictest budget constraints. The smoother performance and added features contribute significantly to a more enjoyable and efficient smartphone experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.