Motorola Moto E13 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 April 26, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 95.71 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 176 g
Height 164.2 mm 159.9 mm
Width 75 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Ice Blue
  • Onyx Black
  • Pearl Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.43 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 84.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 52.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Xiaomi Redmi Note 12SPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1Redmi Note 12S is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)179.5176Negligible weight difference.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality comparison not possible.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDRedmi Note 12S offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.43Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Redmi Note 12S has a significantly sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh RateNot specified90HzRedmi Note 12S provides smoother scrolling and animations thanks to the higher refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606Mediatek Helio G96Redmi Note 12S boasts a more powerful processor, leading to better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Redmi Note 12S has faster and more efficient CPU cores.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MC2Redmi Note 12S has a slightly more powerful GPU, potentially offering better gaming performance.
RAM2/4GB6/8GBRedmi Note 12S offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP108MP (Main) + 8MP (Ultrawide) + 2MP (Macro)Redmi Note 12S offers a much more versatile camera system with higher resolution and ultrawide capabilities.
Front Camera5MP16MPRedmi Note 12S has a significantly better selfie camera with higher resolution.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities, although Redmi Note 12S offers 120fps slow motion.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity.
Charging10W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingRedmi Note 12S charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the "low price" range, making it a budget-friendly option.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with higher resolution and refresh rate delivers a significantly better visual experience.
  • Stronger Performance: More powerful processor, GPU, and more RAM result in smoother multitasking, better gaming, and faster app loading.
  • Versatile Camera: Higher resolution main camera, ultrawide lens, and better selfie camera offer greater photographic flexibility.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the Moto E13's 10W.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

Trade-offs:

  • The Redmi Note 12S's superior features come at a higher price compared to the budget-friendly Moto E13.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality like calling, texting, and web browsing. Suitable for light users or as a secondary device.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S: Best suited for users who value a good display, strong performance, a versatile camera, and fast charging. Excellent for gaming, media consumption, photography enthusiasts, and those who multitask heavily.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Light users might find the Moto E13 sufficient, while power users would benefit from the Redmi Note 12S.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Prioritize features like display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and charging speed.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S

While the Motorola Moto E13 offers an extremely budget-friendly option, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved display (AMOLED, higher resolution, 90Hz), the much more powerful processor and increased RAM, the versatile camera system, faster charging, and the inclusion of NFC provide a vastly superior user experience. The price difference is justified by the substantial upgrade in features and performance. I value a smooth and responsive phone with a good display and camera, and the Redmi Note 12S delivers on all fronts. The Moto E13 feels too compromised in comparison, especially considering the relatively small price jump to the Redmi Note 12S.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.