Motorola Moto E13 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 March 30, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 99.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 183.5 g
Height 164.2 mm 165.7 mm
Width 75 mm 76 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Ice Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Onyx Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5165.7 x 76 x 7.9Redmi Note 12 4G is slightly larger but thinner. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)179.5183.5Redmi is slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality cannot be compared due to missing information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDRedmi Note 12 4G offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.67Redmi has a slightly larger screen, providing more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Redmi's significantly higher resolution results in sharper text and images, a more enjoyable viewing experience.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified120Redmi's 120Hz refresh rate ensures smoother scrolling and animations, making the phone feel more responsive. Moto E13's refresh rate is unknown.
Peak Brightness (nits)Not specified1200Redmi's higher peak brightness makes it easier to view the screen in direct sunlight. Moto E13's peak brightness is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm)Snapdragon 685 is more power-efficient and generally offers better performance than the Unisoc T606.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53)Redmi Note 12 4G has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 610Adreno 610 generally provides better graphics performance for gaming and media consumption than the Mali-G57 MP1.
RAM2GB/4GB4GB/6GB/8GBRedmi Note 12 4G offers more RAM options, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with memory-intensive tasks.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 8MP (Wide) + 2MP (Macro)Redmi offers a significantly more versatile camera system with higher resolution and additional lenses for wide-angle and macro photography.
Front Camera5MP13MPRedmi provides a much higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W33WRedmi Note 12 4G supports much faster charging, significantly reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Belongs to the "low price" range, suggesting greater affordability.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and higher peak brightness contribute to a significantly better viewing experience.
  • Stronger Performance: More powerful and efficient chipset, CPU, and GPU, resulting in smoother operation and better gaming capabilities.
  • More Versatile Camera: Higher resolution main sensor, wide-angle and macro lenses provide greater photographic flexibility.
  • Faster Charging: 33W fast charging drastically reduces charging time compared to the Moto E13's 10W.
  • NFC: Supports contactless payments and data transfer.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light web browsing.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, social media browsing, basic app usage.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G:

  • Ideal User: Users who value a good display, smooth performance, versatile camera, and fast charging. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and photography enthusiasts.
  • Use Cases: Gaming, media consumption (videos, photos), mobile photography, multitasking, everyday use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is likely significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Moto E13 might suffice. For demanding tasks and media consumption, the Redmi Note 12 4G is superior.
  3. Which features do you prioritize? Consider display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and charging speed.

I would choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G. While the Motorola Moto E13 might be more budget-friendly, the Redmi Note 12 4G offers a significantly better overall user experience with its superior display, performance, camera, and faster charging. The benefits in everyday usability and enjoyment outweigh the potential price difference for me. The inclusion of NFC is also a valuable addition for contactless payments. The Moto E13 is likely a decent phone for its price point, but it caters to a much more basic user with limited needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.