Motorola Moto E13 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 193 g
Height 164.2 mm 168.4 mm
Width 75 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Xiaomi Redmi A3xPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5168.4 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi A3x is slightly larger and heavier. May be less comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)179.5193E13 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.71A3x offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1650Negligible difference in resolution at this screen size. Sharpness will be similar.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90A3x's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer decent color reproduction and viewing angles, typical of IPS LCDs.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Unisoc T603 (22 nm)E13's 12nm chipset should be slightly more power-efficient than the 22nm T603 in the A3x.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzSpecific core configuration for the A3x is missing. E13's Cortex-A75 cores likely provide a performance advantage in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MP1Similar GPUs, though clock speeds aren't specified, making a definitive performance comparison difficult.
RAM2GB/4GB3GB/4GBMore RAM options available for both. 4GB provides smoother multitasking.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A3x ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Also has longer OS upgrade support (up to Android 16).
Camera
Rear Camera13MP8MP + 0.1MP (depth)E13 has a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. A3x includes a low-resolution depth sensor, whose practical benefit is questionable.
Front Camera5MP5MPSimilar front camera resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Fast Charging10W10WBoth offer the same charging speed.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Slightly more powerful and efficient processor: Potentially better performance in demanding tasks and slightly improved battery life.
  • Lighter and more compact: More comfortable for one-handed use and extended periods.
  • Higher resolution main camera: Potentially better image quality in various lighting conditions.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x Advantages:

  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Newer Android version with longer support: Access to latest features and security updates for a longer period.
  • Fingerprint sensor: Added security and convenience for unlocking the device.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality, a compact form factor, and all-day battery life. Best for:

  • Calling, texting, and light web browsing
  • Casual social media usage
  • Undemanding mobile games

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Suitable for users seeking a more modern software experience with a smooth display, prioritizing entertainment and content consumption. Best for:

  • Streaming videos and playing casual games
  • Social media browsing
  • Users who value software updates and security

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display smoothness and software updates? If these are priorities, the Redmi A3x is the better choice.
  2. Is a compact and lightweight design a priority? If so, the Moto E13 is preferable.
  3. What is your budget and storage requirement? Consider the available RAM and storage options for each phone and their respective prices.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi A3x

While the Moto E13 offers a slightly more efficient chipset and a potentially better main camera, the Redmi A3x's 90Hz display, newer Android version with longer update support, and fingerprint sensor are more compelling features for me. The smoother user experience provided by the high refresh rate display significantly impacts daily usage, and the longer software support ensures the phone remains secure and up-to-date for a longer period. These factors outweigh the slight advantages of the E13, making the Redmi A3x the better overall choice in my opinion, especially considering the similar price range. The slightly larger size isn't a significant drawback for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.