Motorola Moto E13 vs Xiaomi Poco F6 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 May 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 95.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.73 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 179 g
Height 164.2 mm 160.5 mm
Width 75 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Black
  • Green
  • Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 2400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 52.27 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Xiaomi Poco F6Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5160.5 x 74.5 x 8Poco F6 is slightly shorter, narrower, and thinner.
Weight (g)179.5179Negligible weight difference.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco F6 offers significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles with its AMOLED display.
Display Size (inches)6.56.67Poco F6 has a slightly larger display.
Resolution720 x 16001220 x 2712Poco F6 boasts a much sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzPoco F6's 120Hz refresh rate will provide a smoother and more responsive user experience.
Peak BrightnessNot specified2400 nitsPoco F6 should offer superior outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Poco F6's Snapdragon chip offers significantly faster processing speeds, enabling smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz X4 & 4x2.8 GHz A720 & 3x2.0 GHz A520)The Poco F6's CPU architecture is far more powerful and efficient.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 735Poco F6 provides a drastically improved gaming and graphics rendering experience.
RAM2/4GB8/12GBPoco F6 offers substantially more RAM, enabling significantly better multitasking and app performance.
Storage32/64/128GB256/512GBPoco F6 offers much more storage space for apps, photos, and videos.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 8MP (Wide)Poco F6's higher resolution main camera and inclusion of a wide-angle lens offer greater versatility and potentially better image quality.
Front Camera5MP20MPPoco F6's higher resolution front camera will produce significantly better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with EISPoco F6 allows for much higher resolution video recording with electronic image stabilization.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities.
Charging10W Fast Charging90W Fast ChargingPoco F6 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, more RAM, and a better GPU for smoother multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications.
  • Better Display: AMOLED technology with higher resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness results in a more vibrant, responsive, and visible screen.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, wide-angle lens, and better video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 90W fast charging drastically reduces charging times.
  • More Features: NFC for contactless payments.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication and light usage. Ideal for:

  • Calling and texting
  • Basic web browsing
  • Casual social media use

Xiaomi Poco F6: Users who demand high performance, a great display, and advanced camera features. Ideal for:

  • Mobile gaming
  • Content creation (photography and videography)
  • Demanding applications
  • Multitasking

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is a budget option, while the Poco F6 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks like gaming and content creation.
  3. How important are display quality and camera performance? The Poco F6 significantly outperforms the Moto E13 in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F6

While the Motorola Moto E13 serves its purpose as a budget device, the Xiaomi Poco F6 offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The performance difference is substantial, the display is significantly better, and the camera system is far more capable. Even though the price is higher, the value proposition of the Poco F6 is much stronger for a user who wants a phone that can handle demanding tasks and provide a premium experience. The faster charging alone is a major convenience. While acknowledging that budget constraints might dictate the choice for some, if performance, display, camera, and charging speed are important, the Poco F6 is the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.