Motorola Moto E13 vs TCL 50 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 50 SE
TCL 50 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 102.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 195 g
Height 164.2 mm 168.2 mm
Width 75 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Space Gray
  • Midnight Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 86 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 48.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13TCL 50 SEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5168.2 x 75.5 x 8.1TCL 50 SE is slightly larger and heavier. May be less comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)179.5195Moto E13 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.78TCL 50 SE offers a larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2460TCL 50 SE has a significantly sharper display (396 ppi vs 270 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90TCL 50 SE's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering good color reproduction and viewing angles. However, missing color depth and HDR information limit a comprehensive comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)Helio G88 generally offers better performance in benchmarks, translating to faster app loading and multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)TCL 50 SE has faster CPU cores, potentially leading to smoother performance in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2While Mali-G57 is newer architecture, the MC2 variant in TCL may offer better performance due to higher clock speed (though not specified for Moto E13). Direct comparison is difficult without GPU clock speeds for both.
RAM2/4 GB4/6 GBTCL 50 SE offers more RAM in its configurations, improving multitasking and reducing app closures.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1350TCL 50 SE boasts a much higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detailed photos.
Front Camera (MP)58TCL 50 SE has a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer similar video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005010Negligible difference in battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W33WTCL 50 SE supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Lower price: More budget-friendly.

TCL 50 SE Advantages:

  • Larger, sharper display: More immersive media experience.
  • Significantly better performance: Smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Higher resolution cameras: Potentially better photo quality.
  • Faster charging: Less downtime.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother UI experience.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

Trade-offs:

  • TCL 50 SE: Higher price for increased performance and features.
  • Moto E13: Compromised performance and features for affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, web browsing, and light app usage. Ideal for:

  • First-time smartphone users
  • Students
  • Elderly users

TCL 50 SE: Users who value performance, multimedia consumption, and mobile photography. Ideal for:

  • Gamers
  • Social media enthusiasts
  • Content creators

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and multimedia.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Camera quality, performance, display size and sharpness, battery life.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto E13
  • Balanced Performance and Price: TCL 50 SE
  • Focus on Multimedia and Gaming: TCL 50 SE

My Choice: TCL 50 SE

While the Moto E13 offers an attractive price point, the TCL 50 SE provides a significantly better overall user experience. The sharper display, smoother performance thanks to the faster processor, higher refresh rate, and increased RAM, along with the superior camera and faster charging, justify the higher price for most users. The inclusion of NFC for contactless payments is also a valuable addition. While the Moto E13 serves a niche for budget-conscious buyers, the TCL 50 SE represents a more future-proof investment with its superior capabilities. The slightly larger size and weight are minor trade-offs for the substantial gains in usability and performance.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.