Motorola Moto E13 vs TCL 40 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 April 4, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 109.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 190 g
Height 164.2 mm 167.9 mm
Width 75 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.75 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 109.96 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 45.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13TCL 40 SEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5167.9 x 76.5 x 8.5TCL 40 SE is slightly larger and heavier. May impact one-handed usability.
Weight (g)179.5190Noticeable difference in weight, Moto E13 feels lighter.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.75TCL 40 SE offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Same resolution, but TCL's larger screen results in slightly lower pixel density (260 vs 270 ppi). Difference is negligible in practice.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Higher refresh rate on TCL 40 SE results in smoother scrolling and animations. A significant advantage for user experience.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm)Both are entry-level chipsets. Helio G37 may offer slightly better performance in benchmarks, but real-world difference may be minimal. More RAM in TCL 40 SE will provide smoother multitasking.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Different core architectures. Hard to compare directly without benchmarks, but both target efficiency over raw power.
GPUMali-G57 MP1PowerVR GE8320Difficult to compare without benchmarks. Expect basic gaming performance from both.
RAM2/4 GB4/6 GBTCL 40 SE offers more RAM, leading to better multitasking and app switching performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1350Significantly higher resolution on TCL 40 SE promises better detail and potentially improved low-light performance.
Front Camera (MP)58TCL 40 SE has a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Camera FeaturesBasicTriple camera with depth and macro lensTCL 40 SE offers more versatile camera features.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005010Negligible difference in battery capacity. Expect similar battery life.
Fast Charging10W18WTCL 40 SE supports faster charging, reducing downtime.
Other
NFCNoYesTCL 40 SE supports NFC for contactless payments and other functionalities. A significant advantage for many users.
Price RangeLowLowBoth are budget-friendly options.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Potentially longer software support: Motorola has a slightly better track record with updates in this price range. This is speculative and not guaranteed.

TCL 40 SE Advantages:

  • Larger display with higher refresh rate: More immersive media consumption and smoother user experience.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking performance.
  • Significantly better camera: Higher resolution main sensor and more versatile features.
  • Faster charging: Reduced downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.

Trade-offs:

  • TCL 40 SE's larger size and weight might not be ideal for everyone.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic communication and light web browsing. Users who prefer a smaller, lighter phone.
  • Use Cases: Calling, texting, social media browsing, basic web browsing.

TCL 40 SE:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who want a larger display for media consumption, better camera, and smoother performance. Users who value NFC functionality.
  • Use Cases: Media consumption (videos, games), social media, photography, mobile payments.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? While both are in the low price range, specific pricing and available storage options need consideration.
  2. What screen size do you prefer? Larger screen for media or smaller for one-handed use?
  3. Which features are most important to you? Camera quality, performance, NFC, or battery life?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Motorola Moto E13
  • Larger Screen and Better Camera: TCL 40 SE
  • Need NFC for Mobile Payments: TCL 40 SE

My Choice: TCL 40 SE

While the Motorola Moto E13 offers a smaller and lighter form factor, the TCL 40 SE provides a significantly better overall user experience for a marginal price difference. The larger, high refresh rate display, increased RAM, superior camera system, faster charging, and the inclusion of NFC make it a more compelling device for most users in the budget segment. The slightly larger size is a worthwhile trade-off for the significant gains in functionality and usability. The lack of specific refresh rate information for the Moto E13 further solidifies the TCL 40 SE as the better choice. It offers a more future-proof and versatile experience for everyday use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.