Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 213 g
Height 164.2 mm 162 mm
Width 75 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 88 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Samsung Galaxy S24 FEPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5162 x 77.3 x 8S24 FE slightly shorter and wider, both are slim. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)179.5213S24 FE noticeably heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDDynamic AMOLED 2XS24 FE offers significantly better contrast, color accuracy, and viewing angles with AMOLED.
Display Size (inches)6.56.7Slightly larger screen on the S24 FE provides more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340S24 FE has much sharper and clearer display due to higher resolution.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzS24 FE offers smoother scrolling and animations thanks to the high refresh rate.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Exynos 2400e (4 nm)S24 FE significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking and demanding gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)S24 FE boasts a more powerful and efficient CPU architecture.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Xclipse 940S24 FE offers superior graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.
RAM2/4GB8GBS24 FE offers significantly more RAM, allowing for smoother multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 13MP (Wide) + 8MP (Telephoto)S24 FE has a significantly more versatile camera system with higher resolution and additional lenses.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsS24 FE offers vastly superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution and frame rates.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh4700 mAhMoto E13 has slightly larger battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on usage and efficiency.
Fast Charging10W25WS24 FE supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Slightly larger battery capacity.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM.
  • High-Quality Display: AMOLED display with higher resolution and refresh rate.
  • Versatile Camera System: Multiple lenses, higher resolution, and advanced features.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging.
  • More Future-Proof: Newer hardware, software, and 5G connectivity.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and long battery life. Best for:

  • Basic smartphone users: Making calls, texting, light browsing, and social media.
  • Students: Budget-friendly option for essential communication and note-taking.
  • Elderly users: Simple and easy-to-use interface for basic tasks.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, a versatile camera, and future-proof features. Best for:

  • Power users: Demanding tasks, multitasking, gaming, and content creation.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Capturing high-quality photos and videos.
  • Tech-savvy users: Desire the latest features and performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is a budget option, while the S24 FE is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks and multimedia consumption.
  3. How important are features like camera quality, display quality, and performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Moto E13
  • Balanced Needs and Budget: Consider other mid-range options that offer a better balance than the Moto E13 without the higher price of the S24 FE.
  • Performance and Features are Priority: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

While the Moto E13 offers great value for its price, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is the clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance, stunning AMOLED display, versatile camera system, and future-proof features outweigh the price difference. I prioritize a smooth and enjoyable user experience, high-quality media consumption, and the ability to run demanding applications without lag. The S24 FE provides all of that and more. The faster charging and inclusion of NFC for mobile payments are also significant advantages in my daily usage. While the Moto E13 is a solid budget option for basic needs, the S24 FE offers a significantly better overall user experience and longevity.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.