Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 February 17, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 78.83 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 168 g
Height 164.2 mm 146.3 mm
Width 75 mm 70.9 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Green
  • Graphite
  • Phantom Black
  • Lavender
  • Cream
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.1 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 88.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 425 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1750 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 104.81 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 49.47 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3900 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Samsung Galaxy S23Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5146.3 x 70.9 x 7.6S23 is significantly more compact and pocketable.
Weight (g)179.5168S23 feels lighter in hand.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality impact cannot be assessed.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDDynamic AMOLED 2XS23 offers superior contrast, vibrant colors, and deeper blacks.
Display Size (inches)6.56.1E13 has a larger screen for media consumption, S23 is more one-hand friendly.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340S23 boasts much sharper visuals and clearer text.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzS23 provides smoother scrolling and animations. Missing E13 refresh rate limits comparison.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1750 nitsS23 offers superior outdoor visibility. Missing E13 peak brightness limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)S23 dramatically outperforms in speed, multitasking, and demanding applications.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz X3 & 2x2.8 GHz A715 & 2x2.8 GHz A710 & 3x2.0 GHz A510)S23 has a significantly more powerful and efficient CPU architecture.
RAM2/4GB8GBS23 enables seamless multitasking and faster app loading.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (wide) + 12MP (ultrawide) + 10MP (telephoto)S23 offers vastly superior image quality, versatility with multiple lenses, and optical zoom.
Front Camera5MP12MPS23 provides better selfie quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 8K@30fpsS23 offers significantly higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50003900E13 likely offers longer battery life, but real-world usage will vary.
Fast Charging10W25WS23 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: The larger 5000mAh battery suggests longer usage between charges.
  • Lower Price: The E13 is significantly more affordable.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip provides a vastly improved user experience for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • High-Quality Display: The AMOLED display offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a smoother refresh rate.
  • Advanced Camera System: Versatile triple-lens setup with higher resolution and features like optical zoom.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • More Premium Features: NFC for mobile payments, a more powerful GPU, and under-display fingerprint sensor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication, light web browsing, and long battery life. Ideal for:

  • Basic phone users: Calling, texting, and occasional social media.
  • Students: Simple tasks and note-taking.
  • Elderly users: Easy-to-use interface and long battery life.

Samsung Galaxy S23: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, excellent camera capabilities, and the latest features. Ideal for:

  • Power users: Demanding applications, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Photography enthusiasts: High-quality photos and videos.
  • Tech-savvy users: Latest features and software updates.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The E13 is a budget phone, while the S23 is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. How important are camera quality and display quality to you? The S23 excels in both areas.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy S23

While the Motorola Moto E13 offers excellent value for its price, the Samsung Galaxy S23 is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, stunning display, versatile camera system, and faster charging outweigh the price difference. I value a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to capture great photos and videos. The S23 delivers on all fronts, making it a worthwhile investment in the long run. While battery life might be slightly shorter, the faster charging mitigates this concern. The E13 serves a specific niche for budget-conscious users, but the S23 offers a significantly more compelling overall package.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.