Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 213 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly shorter and wider, but thinner. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)179.5213E13 significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and materials.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA55 offers more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency. E13's LCD is generally less impressive.
Size (inches)6.56.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340A55 significantly sharper and more detailed, especially for media consumption and gaming.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzA55's 120Hz provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience.
HDRNoHDR10+A55 supports HDR content, offering a wider dynamic range and more realistic visuals in compatible media.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55's 4nm chipset significantly more powerful and efficient, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)A55's CPU offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Xclipse 530A55 boasts a more powerful GPU, enabling smoother gaming and graphics performance.
RAM2/4GB8/12GBA55 offers significantly more RAM, allowing for more efficient multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A55 comes with a newer Android version, potentially offering newer features and longer software support.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 13MP (Ultrawide) + 5MP (Macro)A55 offers higher resolution main camera, ultrawide lens for broader shots, and a dedicated macro lens. Expect significantly better image quality and versatility from the A55.
Front Camera5MP32MPA55 offers a much higher resolution front camera for significantly better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA55 capable of recording higher resolution video.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity. However, A55's more efficient chipset likely translates to longer real-world battery life.
Fast Charging10W25WA55 supports significantly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lighter: Easier to hold and use for extended periods.
  • Lower Price: More budget-friendly option.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Smoother multitasking, faster app loading, better gaming experience.
  • Superior display: More vibrant colors, sharper details, smoother scrolling with 120Hz refresh rate.
  • More versatile and capable camera system: Higher resolution sensors, ultrawide and macro lenses, better low-light performance.
  • Faster charging: Less downtime.
  • Newer Android version: Potentially longer software support and newer features.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and light app usage. Suitable for users who don't engage in demanding tasks or mobile gaming.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who value a smooth and responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming and media consumption, require a versatile camera system, and appreciate modern features like NFC.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The E13 is a budget option, while the A55 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. demanding tasks, gaming, and media consumption.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Camera quality, performance, display quality, battery life.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Moto E13 offers an attractive price point, the Samsung Galaxy A55 provides significantly more value for the price difference. The superior performance, display, camera system, and faster charging make it a much more compelling device for a broader range of users. The A55 offers a significantly better user experience in almost every aspect. While the E13 caters to a very specific niche of budget-conscious users with basic needs, the A55's versatility and future-proofing make it a smarter investment for most people. The inclusion of NFC further enhances its practicality for everyday use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.