Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 103.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.25 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 200 g
Height 164.2 mm 160.1 mm
Width 75 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Magical Blue
  • Personality Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 48.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Samsung Galaxy A15 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4A15 slightly shorter and wider, negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)179.5200E13 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
BuildNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality impact on durability unknown due to lack of information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA15 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better outdoor visibility due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.5Same screen size.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 16001080 x 2340A15 significantly sharper and more detailed due to higher resolution (396 ppi vs 270 ppi), impacting clarity of text, images, and videos.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Higher refresh rate on A15 results in smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing perceived performance.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)A15's 6nm chipset significantly more powerful and power-efficient than E13's 12nm Unisoc chip, leading to better multitasking, gaming, and battery life.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)A15 boasts faster and more powerful CPU cores, enabling faster app launches and smoother overall performance.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MC2A15 has a more powerful GPU, improving gaming performance and handling graphically intensive tasks.
RAM2/4 GB4/6/8 GBA15 offers more RAM options, with higher configurations enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
OSAndroid 13Android 14A15 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages. Longer OS update support likely on A15.
Camera
Rear Camera13 MP50 MP (Main) + 5 MP (Wide) + 2 MP (Macro)A15 offers a significantly more versatile camera system with higher resolution main sensor, wide-angle lens, and dedicated macro lens.
Front Camera5 MP13 MPA15 has a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fps with EISBoth record at 1080p, but A15 features Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W25WA15 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lighter: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Budget-friendly option.

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Smoother multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
  • Higher resolution display: Sharper visuals and better clarity.
  • More versatile camera system: Higher resolution sensor, wide-angle and macro lenses.
  • Faster charging: Reduced downtime.
  • 5G Connectivity: Faster data speeds and improved network performance.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and light app usage.

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G: Suitable for users who demand better performance, a superior display, a versatile camera system, and 5G connectivity. Good for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The E13 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs demanding tasks.
  3. How important are features like camera quality, display sharpness, and performance?

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A15 5G

While the Motorola Moto E13 offers an attractive price point, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G provides a significantly better overall user experience. The superior performance, higher resolution display, more versatile camera system, faster charging, and 5G connectivity make it a worthwhile investment for most users, even with the higher price. The A15 offers a more future-proof device with better long-term value. The performance difference alone would heavily influence my decision as it directly impacts daily usability. The significantly improved display and camera are also major factors contributing to a more enjoyable user experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.