Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy A05 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 October 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 116.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 195 g
Height 164.2 mm 168.8 mm
Width 75 mm 78.2 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 82.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 262 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 43.04 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Samsung Galaxy A05Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8Galaxy A05 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)179.5195Moto E13 is noticeably lighter for one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.7A05 offers a slightly larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness despite the A05's larger size.
Panel TypeIPS LCDPLS LCDPLS LCD generally offers slightly better color reproduction and wider viewing angles than IPS LCD, but the difference is often subtle.
Density (PPI)270262Moto E13 has a slightly higher pixel density, but the difference is negligible in practical use.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606Mediatek Helio G85Helio G85 offers better CPU performance, especially in multi-core tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)A05 has faster clock speeds, leading to smoother multitasking and app loading.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2While G57 is a newer generation, the MC2 variant in the A05 likely provides better gaming performance due to its architecture.
RAM (Base Model)2GB | 4GBA05's larger RAM allows for smoother multitasking and less frequent app closures. Note: RAM configurations vary.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)1350 + 2A05 boasts significantly higher resolution for the main rear camera, potentially capturing more detailed photos. The 2MP depth sensor aids in portrait mode.
Front Camera (MP)58A05 has a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsA05 offers 60fps recording for smoother video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W25WA05 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: While both have 5000mAh batteries, the E13's less powerful processor might result in slightly better battery efficiency. This is subjective and depends on usage.

Samsung Galaxy A05 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Helio G85 chipset and larger RAM provide a smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Captures more detailed photos and videos.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
  • 60fps Video Recording: Smoother and more professional-looking videos.
  • Bluetooth 5.3: More power efficient and stable connection compared to Bluetooth 5.0

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic communication (calls, texts, browsing) and long battery life. Less demanding users who don't play demanding games or use many apps simultaneously.
  • Use Cases: Basic smartphone tasks, light web browsing, casual social media use.

Samsung Galaxy A05:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users seeking a balance of performance, camera quality, and features. Suitable for moderate gaming, multitasking, and social media content creation.
  • Use Cases: Mobile gaming, social media, photography, video recording.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Both are budget phones but price differences may exist depending on storage configuration.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic communication vs. gaming, photography, multitasking.
  3. How important is camera quality and performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Moto E13
  • Moderate Budget, Balanced Needs: Samsung Galaxy A05

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A05

While the Motorola Moto E13 offers a lighter and potentially slightly more power-efficient experience, the Samsung Galaxy A05 provides a significantly better overall package for a marginally higher price (if any). The performance difference between the Helio G85 and the Unisoc T606 is substantial, leading to a noticeably smoother user experience. The superior camera system, faster charging, and availability of 60fps video recording further solidify the A05's advantage. For most users in the budget segment, the A05's performance and feature advantages outweigh the E13's slight edge in portability and potential battery life. The higher RAM in the base model of the A05 is also a significant advantage for multitasking. Finally, having Bluetooth 5.3 contributes to future-proofing and better power efficiency.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.