Motorola Moto E13 vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 185 g
Height 164.2 mm 164.6 mm
Width 75 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Realme C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6Realme C65 is slightly wider and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)179.5185Realme C65 is slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.67Realme C65 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1604Virtually identical resolution; both are HD+ and will offer similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)Not specified90Realme C65's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, offering decent color reproduction and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)Helio G85 generally offers better CPU and GPU performance compared to the Unisoc T606, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme C65's higher clocked CPU cores will deliver noticeably faster performance.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2While Mali-G57 is newer architecture, the G52 MC2 in the Realme C65 generally performs better in real-world gaming scenarios due to its higher clock speed.
RAM2GB/4GB6GB/8GBRealme C65 offers significantly more RAM, enabling superior multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Realme C65 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential features and security updates.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 2MP (Depth)Realme C65's 50MP main camera offers significantly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail and better low-light photos compared to the Moto E13.
Front Camera5MP8MPRealme C65 has a higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, although real-world usage may vary depending on other factors.
Fast Charging10W45WRealme C65 offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.
Other
NFCNoYesRealme C65 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Price RangeLowMediumRealme C65 is more expensive.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

Realme C65 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly better processor, GPU, and more RAM. Noticeably faster and smoother in everyday tasks and gaming.
  • Better Display: Smoother 90Hz refresh rate.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging dramatically reduces charging time.
  • More Versatile Camera: Higher resolution main and selfie cameras with more features.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Newer Android Version: Potentially longer software support and newer features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto E13: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, and light social media usage. Suitable for users who are not demanding in terms of performance or advanced features.

Realme C65: Users who value performance, a smooth display, fast charging, and a capable camera. Suitable for gamers, multitaskers, and those who consume a lot of media on their phones.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is a budget option, while the Realme C65 sits in the mid-range.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and gaming.
  3. Which features are most important to you? Performance, camera quality, fast charging, or NFC capabilities.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Usage: Moto E13
  • Balanced Performance and Features: Realme C65

My Choice: Realme C65

While the Motorola Moto E13 is significantly cheaper, the Realme C65 offers a substantial upgrade in performance, camera, display, and charging speed for a reasonable price increase. The 90Hz refresh rate, faster processor, ample RAM, and the inclusion of NFC make the Realme C65 a much more versatile and future-proof device. The significantly faster charging is a major convenience. For the overall value and user experience it provides, the Realme C65 is the clear winner for me. The performance difference alone would make a significant impact on daily usability.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.