Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 179 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.6 mm
Width 75 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.49 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1G55 is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)179.5179Virtually identical weight.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.56.49Negligible size difference.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400G55 has significantly sharper display (405 ppi vs 270 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzG55's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience. E13's refresh rate is unknown.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)G55 has a significantly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)G55 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to noticeable performance improvements.
GPUMali-G57 MP1IMG BXM-8-256G55 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM2/4 GB8 GBG55 offers significantly more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 8MP (Wide)G55 boasts a higher resolution main camera and an additional wide-angle lens, offering greater versatility and potentially better image quality.
Front Camera5MP16MPG55 has a much higher resolution front camera, resulting in better selfie quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsG55 allows for higher frame rate video recording (60fps), resulting in smoother videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity. Real-world battery life will depend on usage and efficiency of each phone.
Charging10W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingG55 supports significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Positioned in the "low price" range, offering budget-conscious consumers an affordable option.

Motorola Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor, GPU, and more RAM for a smoother, more responsive user experience.
  • Better Display: Higher resolution and refresh rate provide a sharper and more fluid visual experience.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, wide-angle lens, and better video recording capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the E13's 10W.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto E13: Suitable for users with basic needs like calling, texting, browsing, and light social media usage. Ideal for budget-conscious individuals or as a secondary device.

Moto G55: Suitable for users who demand better performance, smoother multitasking, higher quality cameras, and a more premium display. Good for gaming, content consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The E13 is a budget phone, while the G55 is mid-range.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Basic use cases vs. demanding tasks like gaming or photography.
  3. How important are features like display quality, camera performance, and charging speed?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Tight Budget, Basic Needs: Moto E13
  • Balanced Performance and Price: Moto G55

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

While the Moto E13 serves its purpose as a budget device, the Moto G55 offers a significantly better overall user experience for a reasonable price increase. The superior performance, display, camera, and faster charging make it a much more versatile and future-proof device. The inclusion of NFC further enhances its practicality for everyday use. The performance difference alone would heavily influence my decision, as a smoother user experience is crucial for daily tasks and long-term satisfaction. Even if the price difference is significant, the added value provided by the G55 makes it a worthwhile investment for most users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.