Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 13, 2023 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 104.68 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 179.5 g 174.9 g
Height 164.2 mm 161.9 mm
Width 75 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Aurora Green
  • Creamy White
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.8 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.77 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto E13Motorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)164.2 x 75 x 8.5161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9Edge 50 Fusion is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)179.5174.9Negligible weight difference.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality comparison not possible without more details.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDP-OLEDEdge 50 Fusion offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.56.7Edge 50 Fusion has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Edge 50 Fusion has a significantly sharper and more detailed display.
Refresh RateUnspecified120HzEdge 50 Fusion will provide smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak BrightnessUnspecified1600 nitsEdge 50 Fusion should be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Edge 50 Fusion offers significantly better performance and efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x1.95 GHz A55)Edge 50 Fusion has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 710Edge 50 Fusion boasts a much more capable GPU for smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM2/4 GB8/12 GBEdge 50 Fusion offers significantly more RAM for seamless multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 13Android 14 (upgradable to 17)Edge 50 Fusion benefits from newer OS features and longer software support.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP50MP (Main) + 13MP (Ultrawide/Macro)Edge 50 Fusion provides higher resolution, potentially better image quality, and versatility with an ultrawide lens.
Front Camera5MP32MPEdge 50 Fusion offers a much higher resolution front camera for better selfies.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@120fpsEdge 50 Fusion supports higher resolution and slow-motion video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity.
Fast Charging10W68WEdge 50 Fusion charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, coupled with more RAM, delivers a much smoother and faster user experience.
  • Higher quality display: The P-OLED display offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a high refresh rate for a premium visual experience.
  • More versatile camera system: Higher resolution sensors, ultrawide lens, and improved video recording capabilities.
  • Faster charging: 68W fast charging significantly reduces downtime.
  • Longer software support: Guaranteed updates to Android 17.

Motorola Moto E13 Advantages:

  • Lower price: Targets budget-conscious consumers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto E13: Suitable for users with basic needs like calling, texting, browsing, and light social media usage. Ideal for budget-conscious buyers or as a secondary device.

Edge 50 Fusion: Ideal for users who demand performance, a premium display, a versatile camera, and fast charging. Suitable for gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto E13 is a budget phone, while the Edge 50 Fusion is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications like gaming and content creation.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Edge 50 Fusion significantly outperforms the Moto E13 in these areas.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

While the Moto E13 serves its purpose as a budget device, the Edge 50 Fusion offers a significantly better overall experience. The superior performance, display, camera, and faster charging justify the higher price for most users. The longer software support also ensures a longer lifespan for the device. The Moto E13 would only be a viable option for extremely budget-constrained users who prioritize basic functionality above all else. The performance difference between the Unisoc T606 and the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, coupled with the RAM disparity, would result in a noticeably smoother and more enjoyable user experience on the Edge 50 Fusion. The vastly improved display and camera system further solidify the Edge 50 Fusion as the better choice for a long-term investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.