Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 29, 2024 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 88.87 cm³ 97.64 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.37 "/g
Weight 171 g 199 g
Height 154.1 mm 160.9 mm
Width 71.2 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 8.1 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine

Display

Screen Size 6.4 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1256 x 2760 1290 x 2796
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 88 %
Pixel Density 474 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 105.22 mAh/in² 104.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.5 mAh/cm³ 47.87 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4310 mAh 4674 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) Apple A18 (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)
GPU Mali-G615 MC2 Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 14 18
Maximum OS Version 19

Comparison Summary

Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs. Apple iPhone 16 Plus: Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 50 NeoApple iPhone 16 PlusPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1 mm160.9 x 77.8 x 7.8 mmiPhone 16 Plus is taller and wider, but slightly thinner. Edge 50 Neo might be more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight171g199gEdge 50 Neo is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Display TypeLTPO P-OLEDSuper Retina XDR OLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and contrast. LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment on the Edge 50 Neo, potentially saving battery.
Display Size6.4 inches6.7 inchesiPhone 16 Plus offers a larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1256 x 27601290 x 2796Both have sharp displays; differences in pixel density are negligible in real-world use.
Refresh Rate120HzNot specified120Hz on the Edge 50 Neo provides smoother scrolling and animations. Lack of information on the iPhone's refresh rate limits comparison.
Peak Brightness3000 nits2000 nits (HBM)Edge 50 Neo should offer superior outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm)Apple A18 (3nm)A18 is likely to offer significantly better performance and efficiency due to Apple's chip design expertise and more advanced manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)A18's architecture and higher clock speeds suggest superior processing power, especially in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G615 MC2Apple GPU (5-core graphics)Apple's custom GPU typically offers leading performance in graphics-intensive applications and games.
RAM12GB8GBWhile the Edge 50 Neo has more RAM, iOS's memory management often allows for efficient performance with less RAM.
Storage512GB256GB/512GBBoth offer ample storage, but the base iPhone 16 Plus model has less storage than the Edge 50 Neo.
Battery
Capacity4310 mAh4674 mAhiPhone 16 Plus has a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life. Real-world usage will depend on software optimization.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 4K@60fps with HDRiPhone offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording with HDR.
Software
OSAndroid 14iOS 18Different operating systems cater to different user preferences. Android offers more customization, while iOS is known for its simplicity and user-friendliness.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display (potentially): Smoother scrolling and animations for a more responsive user experience.
  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • More RAM: Potentially better multitasking performance, although real-world impact depends on OS optimization.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus Advantages:

  • Likely Superior Performance: The A18 chip is expected to deliver significantly faster processing speeds and better graphics performance.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Higher Quality Video Recording: 4K@60fps with HDR offers professional-grade video recording capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Suitable for users who prioritize a smooth display, lighter weight, and value for money. Best for:

  • Casual users: Social media browsing, web surfing, light gaming.
  • Users sensitive to phone weight: Extended use without hand fatigue.

Apple iPhone 16 Plus: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, battery life, high-quality video recording, and the iOS ecosystem. Best for:

  • Power users: Demanding applications, gaming, content creation.
  • Content creators: High-quality video recording and editing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iPhone 16 Plus is expected to be significantly more expensive.
  2. What operating system do you prefer? Android offers customization, while iOS offers simplicity.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Consider whether you prioritize performance, display quality, battery life, or other features.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget and prioritize a smooth display: Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
  • Demand high performance and willing to pay a premium: Apple iPhone 16 Plus.
  • Value video recording capabilities and prefer iOS: Apple iPhone 16 Plus.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.