Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 15, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 93.5 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.83 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 174.9 g 189 g
Height 161.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 73.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 91.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1600 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 53.48 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 50 FusionZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6The Motorola is slightly smaller and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
Weight (g)174.9189The Motorola is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Fingerprint SensorUnder displaySide-mountedUnder-display sensors offer a more modern, integrated aesthetic, while side-mounted sensors can be easier to reach depending on hand size and grip.
Display
Display TypeP-OLED, 1B colorsIPS LCDThe Motorola's OLED display offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors.
Display Size (inches)6.76.6Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612The Motorola's much higher resolution results in sharper text, images, and videos. The difference will be very noticeable.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120/144 (Region Dependent)90The Motorola's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience, especially noticeable in gaming.
Peak Brightness (nits)1600Not specifiedThe Motorola's high peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of data for the ZTE makes a direct comparison impossible.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)The Snapdragon chip in the Motorola is significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The 4nm process also suggests better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)The Motorola's CPU configuration and higher clock speeds provide a substantial performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MP1The Adreno 710 in the Motorola offers significantly better graphics performance, beneficial for gaming and graphically demanding applications.
RAM8GB4GBThe Motorola's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdowns, improving multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB256GBBoth phones offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@ various fps (EIS)1080p@30fpsThe Motorola supports 4K video recording and offers Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) at various resolutions and frame rates, resulting in higher quality and more stable videos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity. However, real-world battery life will depend on factors like display type, chipset efficiency, and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, coupled with 8GB RAM, offers a vastly superior user experience compared to the ZTE's Unisoc T606 and 4GB RAM.
  • Superior display: The OLED display with a higher resolution and refresh rate provides richer colors, sharper visuals, and smoother animations.
  • More versatile camera: 4K video recording and EIS at multiple resolutions and frame rates offer greater flexibility and quality for video capture.
  • More compact and lighter design: Easier to hold and carry.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lower price: Positioned in the "low price" range, it caters to budget-conscious buyers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: Users who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera features. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and media consumption.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Users on a tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic communication, web browsing, and light media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Demanding tasks favor the Motorola.
  3. How important is display and camera quality? The Motorola excels in both areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
  • Budget-conscious student: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Photographer/Videographer: Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
  • Casual user primarily using social media and browsing: ZTE Blade A75 4G (if budget is extremely tight), Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (if some performance headroom is desired).
Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.