Motorola Edge 40 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 4, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 86.68 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.92 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 167 g 189 g
Height 158.4 mm 164.1 mm
Width 72 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Eclipse Black
  • Nebula Green
  • Viva Magenta
  • Lunar Blue
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 102.56 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.76 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.4 x 72 x 7.6164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Edge 40 is noticeably thinner and more compact, easier for one-handed use and pocket portability.
Weight (g)167189Edge 40 feels lighter in hand, reducing fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsMissingMissingMaterial choice impacts durability and premium feel; information lacking for both.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDEdge 40's P-OLED offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.556.6Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1612Edge 40's significantly higher resolution results in sharper text and images, a more pleasing viewing experience.
Refresh Rate (Hz)14490Edge 40's 144Hz delivers smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in games and fast-paced content.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 provides significantly better performance in demanding tasks like gaming and multitasking due to its more powerful CPU and GPU, as well as more efficient 6nm architecture.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Edge 40 has faster and more efficient CPU cores, leading to better responsiveness.
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G57 MP1Edge 40's superior GPU delivers significantly better gaming performance and graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)84/8 (version dependent)More RAM on the Edge 40 (and certain A75 variants) enables smoother multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is similar; image quality depends on sensor size, aperture, and processing, which are not fully comparable here.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsEdge 40 offers higher resolution video recording and HDR for improved dynamic range.
Camera FeaturesOIS, wider aperturePDAFEdge 40 benefits from Optical Image Stabilization for steadier videos and potentially better low-light photos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)44005000A75 has a larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life. However, Edge 40's more efficient display and processor could offset this difference.
Charging SpeedMissingMissingCharging speed significantly impacts usability; information lacking for both.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: Smoother gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness due to a superior processor and GPU.
  • Higher quality display: More vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother animations thanks to P-OLED technology and 144Hz refresh rate.
  • More compact and lightweight design: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Higher resolution video recording with HDR and OIS: Improved video quality and stabilization.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Larger battery capacity: Potentially longer battery life, depending on usage patterns and software optimization.
  • Lower price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Battery Life: Edge 40 prioritizes performance with a more powerful but potentially less power-efficient chipset. A75 focuses on battery life with a larger battery but less powerful processor.
  • Price vs. Features: Edge 40 offers a more premium experience with better display, performance, and camera features but at a higher price. A75 compromises on features to achieve a lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, and a premium feel. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and demanding tasks.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic functionality. Suitable for everyday tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and light media consumption.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Edge 40 is a medium-priced phone, while the A75 is a budget option.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gamers and power users will appreciate the Edge 40's performance. Users who prioritize battery life might prefer the A75.
  3. How important is display quality? The Edge 40's P-OLED display offers a significantly better viewing experience.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a larger battery and a significantly lower price, the Motorola Edge 40 is the clear winner for me. The superior performance, higher quality display (both resolution and refresh rate), more compact design, and advanced camera features are significant advantages that outweigh the battery size difference and higher price. The Dimensity 8020 offers a substantial leap in processing power and graphics rendering compared to the Unisoc T606, making the Edge 40 a much more future-proof device. For my usage, which includes gaming, multitasking, and media consumption, the Edge 40 provides a significantly better user experience. I'm willing to pay the premium for the enhanced performance and quality. The 144Hz refresh rate alone is a huge selling point, making everyday interactions feel incredibly smooth. Finally, the sleeker design of the Edge 40 is more appealing to me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.