Motorola Edge 40 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 4, 2023 February 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 86.68 cm³ 106.58 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.92 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 167 g 193 g
Height 158.4 mm 168.3 mm
Width 72 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Eclipse Black
  • Nebula Green
  • Viva Magenta
  • Lunar Blue
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green (Olive Green)
  • Star Blue (Lake Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.71 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 500 nits
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 102.56 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.76 mAh/cm³ 46.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40Xiaomi Redmi A3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.4 x 72 x 7.6168.3 x 76.3 x 8.3Edge 40 is significantly more compact and thinner. Redmi A3 is larger and heavier. Edge 40 will be easier to hold and pocket.
Weight (g)167193Reinforces the difference in portability; Edge 40 feels noticeably lighter.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without this information.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDIPS LCDEdge 40 offers deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency due to P-OLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.556.71Redmi A3 has a slightly larger screen, offering more screen real estate for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 2400720 x 1650Edge 40 has a much sharper display with higher pixel density (402 ppi vs 268 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)14490Edge 40's significantly higher refresh rate provides smoother animations, scrolling, and gaming experience.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm)Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 is a considerably more powerful and efficient chip, offering significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming. The 6nm process also contributes to better battery life.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53)Edge 40 utilizes more powerful Cortex-A78 cores, resulting in a substantial performance advantage over the Redmi A3's Cortex-A53 cores.
GPUMali-G77 MC9PowerVR GE8320Edge 40's GPU is significantly more capable for gaming and graphically intensive tasks.
RAM8 GB3/4/6 GBEdge 40's 8GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding applications compared to Redmi A3's lower RAM options.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)508Edge 40 boasts a much higher resolution main sensor promising significantly better image quality, especially in low light.
Front Camera (MP)325Edge 40's front camera offers higher resolution for better selfies and video calls.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 1080p@30fpsEdge 40 supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)44005000While Redmi A3 has a larger battery capacity, the Edge 40's more efficient processor might offset this difference in real-world usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Dimensity 8020 chipset, combined with 8GB RAM, offers a superior experience in gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Superior display: The P-OLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, and exceptionally smooth visuals.
  • More compact and premium design: The slimmer profile and lighter weight make it more pocketable and comfortable to hold.
  • Higher resolution cameras: Captures significantly better photos and videos.

Xiaomi Redmi A3 Advantages:

  • Larger battery: The 5000mAh battery potentially offers longer battery life, although this needs real-world testing to confirm given the less efficient processor.
  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable, making it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.

Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Price: The Edge 40 offers significantly better performance but at a higher price point. The Redmi A3 prioritizes affordability over performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40: Users who prioritize performance, a smooth and vibrant display, a premium feel, and good camera quality. Ideal for gaming, media consumption, and demanding tasks.

Xiaomi Redmi A3: Users on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life (potentially), and simple usage. Suitable for calling, texting, browsing, and light social media use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Redmi A3 is a budget option, while the Edge 40 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary use cases? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Edge 40 is a clear winner. For basic usage, the Redmi A3 might suffice.
  3. Do you prioritize display quality and performance, or battery life and affordability? The Edge 40 excels in the former, while the Redmi A3 focuses on the latter.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40

While the Redmi A3 offers a compelling price, the Motorola Edge 40's significant advantages in performance, display, and overall user experience make it the clear winner for me. The Dimensity 8020, coupled with the 144Hz P-OLED display, promises a fluid and responsive experience that is crucial for my usage. The superior camera system is also a major plus. I am willing to pay the price premium for the long-term benefits of a more powerful and enjoyable device. The compact form factor is also more appealing to me. The Redmi A3, while offering excellent value, compromises too much on performance and key features for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.