Motorola Edge 40 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola Edge 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date May 4, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 86.68 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.92 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 167 g 189 g
Height 158.4 mm 171.4 mm
Width 72 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Eclipse Black
  • Nebula Green
  • Viva Magenta
  • Lunar Blue
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 102.56 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.76 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4400 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Edge 40Motorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.4 x 72 x 7.6171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is taller and wider but slightly thinner when unfolded. Edge 40 is significantly lighter. Razr's foldability offers portability but adds weight and thickness.
Weight (g)167189Edge 40 is noticeably lighter for everyday use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50 Ultra offers a compact folded size for pocketability.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr's foldable AMOLED with LTPO likely offers better power efficiency and potentially improved outdoor visibility due to higher peak brightness.
Size (inches)6.556.9Razr 50 Ultra offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144165Both offer incredibly smooth scrolling and animations, but the Razr 50 Ultra has a slight edge.
Peak Brightness (nits)12003000Razr 50 Ultra should be significantly brighter outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Razr 50 Ultra utilizes a more powerful and efficient processor, resulting in smoother performance, especially in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Razr 50 Ultra's CPU architecture offers superior performance, particularly in single-core tasks.
RAM (GB)812Razr 50 Ultra offers more RAM for better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both have similar main camera resolution; however, the sensor specifics (e.g., sensor size) would determine actual image quality differences. This data is incomplete.
TelephotoNoYes (50MP)Razr 50 Ultra offers optical zoom capabilities for better zoomed images.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)44004000Edge 40 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life despite the Razr's LTPO display. Real-world usage will vary.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Edge 40 Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact (when Razr is unfolded): More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.
  • Potentially longer battery life: Larger battery capacity.
  • Lower price: Offers strong value for its specifications.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable design: Offers unparalleled portability.
  • More powerful processor and more RAM: Smoother performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Brighter display with LTPO: Improved outdoor visibility and power efficiency.
  • Telephoto lens: Enables optical zoom for versatile photography.
  • More recent OS with longer support: Android 14 out of the box with updates to 17.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Edge 40:

  • Ideal User: Users seeking a lightweight, affordable phone with a smooth display and good performance for everyday tasks.
  • Use Cases: Web browsing, social media, casual gaming, media consumption.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra:

  • Ideal User: Users prioritizing portability and style, willing to pay a premium for a foldable device with top-tier performance and a great display. Early adopters who value the latest technology.
  • Use Cases: Users who value portability above all else, professionals needing a powerful device on the go, content creators leveraging the flexible form factor.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is foldability a priority? If ultimate portability is crucial, the Razr 50 Ultra is the clear choice.
  2. What is your budget? The Edge 40 offers excellent value if price is a major concern.
  3. What level of performance do you need? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Razr 50 Ultra's superior processor and RAM are advantageous.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, prioritizing practicality: Motorola Edge 40
  • Desire for the latest technology and portability, budget less of a concern: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

My Choice: Motorola Edge 40

While the Razr 50 Ultra offers compelling features like foldability and a powerful processor, the Motorola Edge 40 better suits my personal needs. I prioritize a lightweight and comfortable phone for everyday use, and the Edge 40 excels in this area. The larger battery capacity is also appealing, as is the lower price point. While I appreciate the advancements in the Razr 50 Ultra, the foldable form factor and premium price aren't essential for my usage. The Edge 40 offers a well-rounded package of performance, battery life, and comfortable handling at a more attractive price. I am also not an early adopter and prefer a more mature technology.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.